ArticleScientific reports2023
Uncovering the factors that affect earthquake insurance uptake using supervised machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The escalating threat of natural disasters to public safety worldwide underlines the crucial role of effective environmental risk management tools, such as insurance. This is particularly evident in the case of earthquakes that occurred in Oklahoma between 2011 and 2020, which were linked to wastewater injection, underscoring the need for earthquake insurance. In this regard, from a survey of 812 respondents in Oklahoma, USA, we used supervised machine learning techniques (i.e., logit, ridge, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), decision tree, and random forest classifiers) to identify the factors that influence earthquake insurance uptake and to predict individuals who would acquire earthquake insurance. Our findings reveal that influential factors that affect earthquake insurance uptake include demographic factors such as older age, male gender, race, and ethnicity. These were found to significantly influence the decision to purchase earthquake insurance. Additionally, individuals residing in rental properties were less likely to purchase earthquake insurance, while longer residency in Oklahoma had a positive influence. Past experience of earthquakes was also found to positively influence the decision to purchase earthquake insurance. Both decision trees and random forests demonstrated good predictive capabilities for identifying earthquake insurance uptake. Notably, random forests exhibited higher precision and robustness, emerging as an encouraging choice for earthquake insurance modeling and other classification problems. Empirically, we highlight the importance of insurance as an environmental risk management tool and emphasize the need for awareness and education on earthquake insurance as well as the use of supervised machine learning algorithms for classification problems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.