Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38044373›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2024

Radiological evaluation before and after treatment with an osseointegrated bone-anchor following major limb amputation-a guide for radiologists.

Norbert Kang, Yazan Al-Ajam, Phyllis Keen, Alexander Woollard, Hannah Steinitz, Joanna Farrant, Geoffrey Chow

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Norbert KangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Yazan Al-AjamDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Phyllis KeenFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College Rd, London, UK. phyllis.keen1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0738-398X
Alexander WoollardDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Hannah SteinitzDepartment of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Joanna FarrantDepartment of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Geoffrey ChowDepartment of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osseointegrated implants have been developed to allow direct skeletal fixation of a prosthesis as an alternative to traditional socket-fitted prostheses for patients who have suffered from a major limb amputation. The implants contribute to improvements in functional outcome and quality of life and radiological evaluation plays a crucial role in pre- and post-operative assessment. This article acts as a guide for radiologists who may be tasked with providing the radiological information required by surgeons and prosthetists. We also look at the radiological appearances of complications that may arise in patients treated with an osseointegrated implant. Plain X-rays are used to screen patients who wish to undergo treatment. Limb-length X-rays are then used to measure the length of any residual bone, and comparisons can be made with the normal side (if present). From this, decisions about the likely size of the implant and the need for further amputation can be made. CT scans enable accurate assessment of the medullary cavity and cortical thickness. Post-operatively, plain X-rays form the mainstay of the routine monitoring of the bone-implant interface. Potential complications include infection, aseptic loosening, mechanical fracture of the implant and periprosthetic fracture. Infection and aseptic loosening can be seen as a lucency at the bone-implant interface which (if left untreated) can lead to loss of the implant. Implant and periprosthetic fractures are radiographically obvious. Radiologists involved in the care of patients undergoing treatment with an osseointegrated implant should become familiar with the imaging requirements so they can contribute to optimal patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsQuality of LifeAmputation, SurgicalHumansProsthesis DesignProsthesis ImplantationRadiologistsTreatment OutcomeAmputationBone-anchorDirect skeletal fixationOsseointegrationRadiology

Identifiers

PMID38044373
PMCPMC11001742
OpenAlexW4389298642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.