Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38043905›Full record

ArticleUrology2024

Incidental Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Is Common After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

Akihisa Sakai, Tudor Borza, Ali Antar, Ethan Richmond, Glenn O Allen, Margaret Knoedler, Christopher Manakas, Wei Huang, Daniel Gralnek, Matthew D Grimes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akihisa SakaiDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Tudor BorzaDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Ali AntarDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Ethan RichmondDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Glenn O AllenDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Margaret KnoedlerDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Christopher ManakasDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Wei HuangDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Daniel GralnekDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Matthew D GrimesDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. Electronic address: grimes@urology.wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Wisconsin Multidisciplinary K12 Urologic Research Career Development ProgramK12DK100022 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHAD M. VEZINA · 2013 to 2026
$8.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK100022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the incidence of incidental prostate cancer detection (iPCa) after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). The published rate of iPCa after HoLEP is widely variable from 7% to 23% and we aim to define preoperative risk factors for iPCa to inform risk-adjusted preoperative evaluation for PCa.

methodsConsecutive patients undergoing HoLEP from 2018 to 2022 were included and comprehensive clinical data abstracted from a prospectively maintained database. iPCa was defined as a diagnosis of PCa on pathologic examination of the HoLEP specimen. Patients with and without iPCa were compared with respect to preoperative clinical variables.

resultsOf 913 HoLEP patients, 183 (20%) were diagnosed with iPCa. Most patients (95%) had a preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), 9% had negative MRI, and 30% had negative prostate biopsy. On multivariable analysis, PSA density (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.03, 1.10; P < .001), preoperative biopsy status (OR 0.47, CI 0.30, 0.75; P = .002), and current 5-alpha reductase inhibitor use (OR 0.64, CI 0.43, 0.97; P = .034), were associated with iPCa diagnosis.

conclusionIn a significantly prescreened population, we identified a 20% rate of iPCa after HoLEP. Preoperative characteristics associated with iPCa diagnosis included increasing age, increasing PSA density, and current 5-alpha reductase inhibitor use. However, these factors alone may be of limited clinical utility to prospectively identify patients at high risk of iPCa diagnosis. We suggest and advocate for development of a standardized, risk-adapted evaluation focused on expanded use of imaging and selective biopsy to prioritize identification of clinically significant PCa prior to nononcologic surgery.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic Neoplasms5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsCyanoacrylatesHolmiumHumansMaleProstateProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsCyanoacrylatesHolmiumisopropyl cyanoacrylateProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38043905
PMCPMC10872358
OpenAlexW4389219291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.