Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38043579›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2024

A wide dynamic range diamond quantum sensor as an electric vehicle battery monitor.

Yuji Hatano, Junya Tanigawa, Akimichi Nakazono, Takeharu Sekiguchi, Shinobu Onoda, Takeshi Ohshima, Takayuki Iwasaki, Mutsuko Hatano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A special issue preface: diamond for quantum applications.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuji HatanoDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9768-2778
Junya TanigawaYazaki Research and Technology Center, YAZAKI Corporation, Susono, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3389-2397
Akimichi NakazonoYazaki Research and Technology Center, YAZAKI Corporation, Susono, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3348-8618
Takeharu SekiguchiDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4399-5541
Shinobu OnodaQuantum Materials and Applications Research Center (QUARC), National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Takasaki, Gunma, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1425-0708
Takeshi OhshimaQuantum Materials and Applications Research Center (QUARC), National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Takasaki, Gunma, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7850-3164
Takayuki IwasakiDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6319-7718
Mutsuko HatanoDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7722-5927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To demonstrate the application capability of the diamond quantum sensor as an electric vehicle (EV) battery monitor, we (i) investigated the measurable current in a real car noise level and (ii) compared the linearity with conventional sensors. Consequently, (i) we could measure a 20 mA current pulse even under an external magnetic field of 80 µT, which is larger than that of 50 µT around the EV battery module in a real car during driving. The 20 mA pulse measurement corresponds to the EV battery state of charge estimation accuracy of 0.2% in the standard driving pattern, which is smaller than the present level of 10%. (ii) The linearity degradation seen in the Hall sensor near the upper limit of the measurement range was not seen in the diamond sensor. Although the Hall sensor and the shunt resistor showed linearity degradation in the current range of several tens of amperes or less, the degradation was smaller for the diamond sensor. The transverse magnetic field effect in the diamond sensor on the linearity was estimated to be less than 0.01% for a several-degree misalignment of the sensor surface to the magnetic field direction and under a 340 A current. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Diamond for quantum applications'.

Indexed as

current sensordiamond quantum sensorelectric vehicle battery monitormagnetic field sensormulti-modal sensornitrogen-vacancy centre

Identifiers

PMID38043579
PMCPMC10693976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.