ArticleUpdates in surgery2024
The effects of surgical resection in the treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of stratified management of Ki-67 on the prognosis of small-cell lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy demonstrated improved efficacy and comparable safety to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- The screening of optimal primary tumor resection candidates in patients with small cell lung cancer: a population-based predictive model.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the effects of surgical resection on the treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer and identify patient characteristics that may indicate a benefit from surgical resection. We retrospectively reviewed medical data from patients diagnosed with small cell lung cancer between January 2013 and December 2020 at three hospitals. A total of 478 patients were included in the study, 153 patients received surgery treatment and 325 patients received non-surgery treatment. Survival differences between the surgical resection group and the nonsurgical resection group were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. The overall survival in the surgical resection group was significantly improved compared to that in the nonsurgical resection group (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.370-0.876, p = 0.0126). Surgical resection significantly improved overall survival compared to nonsurgical resection in stage I disease (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.94, p = 0.029) and stage IIA disease (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.92, p = 0.019). However, no significant differences in overall survival were found between surgical resection and nonsurgical resection in stage IIB disease (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.57-1.29, p = 0.46) and stage III disease (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.71-1.39, p = 0.97). The overall survival of patients who underwent lobectomy was significantly better than that of patients who underwent sublobular resection (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.15-4.16, p = 0.021) and who underwent pneumonectomy (HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.29-5.28, p = 0.009). Surgical resection should be recommended for patients diagnosed with stage I-IIA SCLC. When deciding on the surgical type, it is preferable to choose lobectomy over sublobar resection or pneumonectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38043121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.