Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38043007›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2024

Subcutaneous fat predicts bone metastasis in breast cancer: A novel multimodality-based deep learning model.

Shidi Miao, Haobo Jia, Wenjuan Huang, Ke Cheng, Wenjin Zhou, Ruitao Wang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning in multi-modal breast cancer data fusion: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shidi MiaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Haobo JiaSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Wenjuan HuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Ke ChengSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Wenjin ZhouSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Ruitao WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Harbin University of Science and Technology · CNHarbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study explores a deep learning (DL) approach to predicting bone metastases in breast cancer (BC) patients using clinical information, such as the fat index, and features like Computed Tomography (CT) images.

methodsCT imaging data and clinical information were collected from 431 BC patients who underwent radical surgical resection at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The area of muscle and adipose tissue was obtained from CT images at the level of the eleventh thoracic vertebra. The corresponding histograms of oriented gradients (HOG) and local binary pattern (LBP) features were extracted from the CT images, and the network features were derived from the LBP and HOG features as well as the CT images through deep learning (DL). The combination of network features with clinical information was utilized to predict bone metastases in BC patients using the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) algorithm. Regularized Cox regression models were employed to identify independent prognostic factors for bone metastasis.

resultsThe combination of clinical information and network features extracted from LBP features, HOG features, and CT images using a convolutional neural network (CNN) yielded the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.922 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.843-0.964, P< 0.01). Regularized Cox regression results indicated that the subcutaneous fat index was an independent prognostic factor for bone metastasis in breast cancer (BC).

conclusionSubcutaneous fat index could predict bone metastasis in BC patients. Deep learning multimodal algorithm demonstrates superior performance in assessing bone metastases in BC patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSubcutaneous FatTomography, X-Ray Computedand histograms of oriented gradient (HOG) features can effectively predict bone metastases;•The mask-guided attention mechanism effectively makes the model focus on the fat area.bone metastasesBreast cancerdeep learninglocal binary pattern (LBP) featuresmultimodalityKey points:•Subcutaneous fat index is an independent prognostic factor for bone metastasis in BC patients;•A multimodal model using computed tomography (CT) imagessubcutaneous fat

Identifiers

PMID38043007
PMCPMC11091603
OpenAlexW4389081125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.