Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38042904›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Predicting long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation in the era of artificial intelligence.

Samarra Badrouchi, Mohamed Mongi Bacha, Abdulaziz Ahmed, Taieb Ben Abdallah, Ezzedine Abderrahim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. XGBoost Outperforms Traditional Transplant Regulatory Models Based on Regression.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Samarra BadrouchiDepartment of Internal Medicine A, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia. samarra.nephro@gmail.com.
Mohamed Mongi BachaDepartment of Internal Medicine A, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Abdulaziz AhmedDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Taieb Ben AbdallahDepartment of Internal Medicine A, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Ezzedine AbderrahimDepartment of Internal Medicine A, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Tunis University · TNHôpital Charles-Nicolle · TNTunis El Manar University · TNUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to accurately predict long-term kidney transplant survival can assist nephrologists in making therapeutic decisions. However, predicting kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes is challenging due to the complexity of the factors involved. Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an increasingly important tool in the prediction of medical outcomes. Our goal was to utilize both conventional and AI-based methods to predict long-term kidney transplant survival. Our study included 407 KTs divided into two groups (group A: with a graft lifespan greater than 5 years and group B: with poor graft survival). We first performed a traditional statistical analysis and then developed predictive models using machine learning (ML) techniques. Donors in group A were significantly younger. The use of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) was the only immunosuppressive drug that was significantly associated with improved graft survival. The average estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the 3rd month post-KT was significantly higher in group A. The number of hospital readmissions during the 1st year post-KT was a predictor of graft survival. In terms of early post-transplant complications, delayed graft function (DGF), acute kidney injury (AKI), and acute rejection (AR) were significantly associated with poor graft survival. Among the 35 AI models developed, the best model had an AUC of 89.7% (Se: 91.9%; Sp: 87.5%). It was based on ten variables selected by an ML algorithm, with the most important being hypertension and a history of red-blood-cell transfusion. The use of AI provided us with a robust model enabling fast and precise prediction of 5-year graft survival using early and easily collectible variables. Our model can be used as a decision-support tool to early detect graft status.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationArtificial IntelligenceGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidneyRetrospective StudiesTissue DonorsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID38042904
PMCPMC10693633
OpenAlexW4389272572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.