ArticleScientific reports2023
A critical review of rheological models in self-compacting concrete for sustainable structures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Freeze-thaw performance of self-compacting concrete with GGBFS, fly ash and limestone powder: linking strength loss to air-void parameters.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Rheological characterisation of clay-cement sealing suspensions with fractionated coal fly ashes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of the rheological properties of mortar compounded with desert sand and Pisha sandstone ceramic sand based on density-form coupling.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studying the rheological behavior of concrete, especially self-compacting concrete is vital in the design and structural integrity of concrete structures for design, construction, and structural material sustainability. Both analytical and numerical techniques have been applied in the previous research works to study precisely the behavior of the yield stress and plastic viscosity of the fresh self-compacting concrete with the associated flow properties and these results have not been systematically presented in a critical review, which will allow researchers, designers and filed operators the opportunity to be technically guided in their design and model techniques selection in order to achieve a more sustainable concrete model for sustainable concrete buildings. Also, the reported analytical and numerical techniques have played down on the effect of the shear strain rate behavior and as to reveal the viscosity changes of the Bingham material with respect to the strain rate. In this review paper, a critical study has been conducted to present the available methods from various research contributions and exposed the inability of these contributions to revealing the effect of the shear strain rate on the rheological behavior of the self-compacting concrete. With this, decisions related to the rheology and flow of the self-compacting concrete would have been made with apt and more exact considerations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.