Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38042857›Full record

ArticleScientific data2023

Real-time speech MRI datasets with corresponding articulator ground-truth segmentations.

Matthieu Ruthven, Agnieszka M Peplinski, David M Adams, Andrew P King, Marc Eric Miquel

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthieu RuthvenClinical Physics, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7465-3042
Agnieszka M PeplinskiClinical Physics, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK. agnieszka.peplinski@nhs.net.ORCID 0009-0000-6392-9982
David M AdamsClinical Physics, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK.
Andrew P KingSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Marc Eric MiquelClinical Physics, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK. marc.miquel@nhs.net.

Funding

DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) ICA-CDRF-2018-04-ST2-032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rt-MRI) of speech is increasing in clinical practice and speech science research. Analysis of such images often requires segmentation of articulators and the vocal tract, and the community is turning to deep-learning-based methods to perform this segmentation. While there are publicly available rt-MRI datasets of speech, these do not include ground-truth (GT) segmentations, a key requirement for the development of deep-learning-based segmentation methods. To begin to address this barrier, this work presents rt-MRI speech datasets of five healthy adult volunteers with corresponding GT segmentations and velopharyngeal closure patterns. The images were acquired using standard clinical MRI scanners, coils and sequences to facilitate acquisition of similar images in other centres. The datasets include manually created GT segmentations of six anatomical features including the tongue, soft palate and vocal tract. In addition, this work makes code and instructions to implement a current state-of-the-art deep-learning-based method to segment rt-MRI speech datasets publicly available, thus providing the community and others with a starting point for developing such methods.

Indexed as

Dental ArticulatorsSpeechAdultHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID38042857
PMCPMC10693552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.