Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38042855›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2023

Prognostic value of capillary refill time in adult patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Matthias Jacquet-Lagrèze, Aymeric Pernollet, Eduardo Kattan, Hafid Ait-Oufella, Delphine Chesnel, Martin Ruste, Rémi Schweizer, Bernard Allaouchiche, Glenn Hernandez, Jean-Luc Fellahi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. DiCARTJournal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Role of Microcirculation in Haemodynamics: A Journey from Atlas to Sisyphus.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias Jacquet-LagrèzeService d'anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, 59 Bd Pinel, 69500, Hospices Civils de LyonBron, France. matthias.jacquet-lagreze@chu-lyon.fr.
Aymeric PernolletService d'anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, 59 Bd Pinel, 69500, Hospices Civils de LyonBron, France.
Eduardo KattanDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Hafid Ait-OufellaHôpital Saint-Antoine, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Delphine ChesnelService d'anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, 59 Bd Pinel, 69500, Hospices Civils de LyonBron, France.
Martin RusteService d'anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, 59 Bd Pinel, 69500, Hospices Civils de LyonBron, France.
Rémi SchweizerService d'anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, 59 Bd Pinel, 69500, Hospices Civils de LyonBron, France.
Bernard AllaouchicheFaculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 8, Avenue Rockefeller, 69373, Lyon Cedex 08, France.
Glenn HernandezDepartamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Jean-Luc FellahiService d'anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, 59 Bd Pinel, 69500, Hospices Civils de LyonBron, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRLille’s Cardiology Hospital · FRPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRHôpital Louis Pradel · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcute circulatory failure leads to tissue hypoperfusion. Capillary refill time (CRT) has been widely studied, but its predictive value remains debated. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the ability of CRT to predict death or adverse events in a context at risk or confirmed acute circulatory failure in adults.

methodMEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google scholar databases were screened for relevant studies. The pooled area under the ROC curve (AUC ROC), sensitivity, specificity, threshold, and diagnostic odds ratio using a random-effects model were determined. The primary analysis was the ability of abnormal CRT to predict death in patients with acute circulatory failure. Secondary analysis included the ability of CRT to predict death or adverse events in patients at risk or with confirmed acute circulatory failure, the comparison with lactate, and the identification of explanatory factors associated with better accuracy.

resultsA total of 60,656 patients in 23 studies were included. Concerning the primary analysis, the pooled AUC ROC of 13 studies was 0.66 (95%CI [0.59; 0.76]), and pooled sensitivity was 54% (95%CI [43; 64]). The pooled specificity was 72% (95%CI [55; 84]). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 3.4 (95%CI [1.4; 8.3]). Concerning the secondary analysis, the pooled AUC ROC of 23 studies was 0.69 (95%CI [0.65; 0.74]). The prognostic value of CRT compared to lactate was not significantly different. High-quality CRT was associated with a greater accuracy.

conclusionCRT poorly predicted death and adverse events in patients at risk or established acute circulatory failure. Its accuracy is greater when high-quality CRT measurement is performed.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsShockAdultHumansOdds RatioPrognosisAcute circulatory failureCapillary refill timeMicrocirculationSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID38042855
PMCPMC10693708
OpenAlexW4389265291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.