Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38042828›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2023

Simulation-based development: shaping clinical procedures for extra-uterine life support technology.

J S van Haren, M B van der Hout-van der Jagt, N Meijer, M Monincx, F L M Delbressine, X L G Griffith, S G Oei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial womb technology - A more physiologic solution to treating extreme prematurity.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A Volume-Adjustable Artificial Womb for Extremely Preterm Infants.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J S van HarenDepartment of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. j.s.v.haren@tue.nl.
M B van der Hout-van der JagtDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
N MeijerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
M MonincxDepartment of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
F L M DelbressineDepartment of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
X L G GriffithDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
S G OeiDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme EU863087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch into Artificial Placenta and Artificial Womb (APAW) technology for extremely premature infants (born < 28 weeks of gestation) is currently being conducted in animal studies and shows promising results. Because of the unprecedented nature of a potential treatment and the high-risk and low incidence of occurrence, translation to the human condition is a complex task. Consequently, the obstetric procedure, the act of transferring the infant from the pregnant woman to the APAW system, has not yet been established for human patients. The use of simulation-based user-centered development allows for a safe environment in which protocols and devices can be conceptualized and tested. Our aim is to use participatory design principles in a simulation context, to gain and integrate the user perspectives in the early design phase of a protocol for this novel procedure.

methodsSimulation protocols and prototypes were developed using an iterative participatory design approach; usability testing, including general and task-specific feedback, was obtained from participants with clinical expertise from a range of disciplines. The procedure made use of fetal and maternal manikins and included animations and protocol task cards.

resultsPhysical simulation with the active participation of clinicians led to the diffusion of tacit knowledge and an iteratively formed shared understanding of the requirements and values that needed to be implemented in the procedure. At each sequel, participant input was translated into simulation protocols and design adjustments.

conclusionThis work demonstrates that simulation-based participatory design can aid in shaping the future of clinical procedure and product development and rehearsing future implementation with healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

Artificial placentaArtificial wombCo-creationExtra-uterine life supportParticipatory designPerinatal life support technologySimulation-based development

Identifiers

PMID38042828
PMCPMC10693037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.