Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38042811›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

The feasibility of self-performing measurements of peripheral oxygen saturation and respiratory exercises in home-isolated COVID-19 patients-a single-arm prospective trial.

Hans Joakim Myklebust-Hansen, Eivind Hasvik, Volker M Solyga, Waleed Ghanima

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04647747 (Silent Hypoxia and Awake Proning in COVID-19 Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 66% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04647747 nacompletednot on this map

Silent Hypoxia and Awake Proning in COVID-19 Patients: Home Monitoring and Self-Reporting

TypeinterventionalSponsorOstfold Hospital TrustRan2020 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsCovid19, HypoxemiaArmsSelf measurement with pulse oximeter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hans Joakim Myklebust-HansenDepartment of Acute Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, 1714, Grålum, Norway. hans.joakim.hansen@so-hf.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1265-5720
Eivind HasvikDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8770-5019
Volker M SolygaDepartment of Acute Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, 1714, Grålum, Norway.
Waleed GhanimaDepartment of Acute Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, 1714, Grålum, Norway.
Østfold Hospital Trust · NOMartina Hansens Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 is a highly contagious disease where isolation of infected individuals is deemed warranted. If possible, home isolation is preferred over hospitalization. This implies a need for methods of observation that can ensure the safety of these patients. Preventive treatment methods that can both decrease the probability for development of critical disease and hopefully decrease the need for hospitalization would be an added benefit. This was a single-arm prospective pilot study performed to assess the feasibility of performing self-measurements of SpO2 and respiratory exercises in at-home isolated COVID-19 patients.

methodA total of 40 ambulant SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals in home isolation were followed up for a period of 14 days. At baseline, they were equipped with a pulse oximeter, PEF meter, a project diary to note all measurements, and simple instructions on how to perform respiratory exercises. No other contact was made, but participants were instructed to contact the hospital based on given criteria for blood oxygenation levels and dyspnea severity and to return study equipment and the project diary at the end of study.

resultsDuring the follow-up period, 35 participants (87.5%) recorded daily SpO2 measurements, and 12 (30%) adhered to daily respiratory exercises as instructed. Four participants (10%) were admitted to hospital during the follow-up period. Five participants terminated follow-up prematurely.

conclusionsPerforming self-measurements of SpO2 during home isolation due to COVID-19 infection is feasible. The feasibility of performing respiratory exercises in ambulant patients is questionable and may require more motivational interventions to increase adherence.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04647747.

Indexed as

COVID-19FeasibilityRespiratory exercisesSelf-measurementsSilent hypoxia

Identifiers

PMID38042811
PMCPMC10693052
OpenAlexW4389265399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.