Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38042810›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a healthy relationship tool for men who use intimate partner violence (BETTER MAN).

Kelsey Hegarty, Laura Tarzia, Carolina Navarro Medel, Mohajer Hameed, Patty Chondros, Lisa Gold, Simone Tassone, Gene Feder, Cathy Humphreys

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelsey HegartyDepartment of General Practice & Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Laura TarziaDepartment of General Practice & Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. laura.tarzia@unimelb.edu.au.
Carolina Navarro MedelDepartment of General Practice & Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Mohajer HameedSchool of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Patty ChondrosDepartment of General Practice & Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Lisa GoldSchool of Health & Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Simone TassoneFamily Safety Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Gene FederBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Cathy HumphreysSchool of Social Work, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUDeakin University · AULa Trobe University · AUUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP2000952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is common globally, but there is a lack of research on how to intervene early with men who might be using IPV. Building on evidence supporting the benefits of online interventions for women victim/survivors, this study aims to test whether a healthy relationship website (BETTER MAN) is effective at improving men's help seeking, their recognition of behaviours as IPV and their readiness to change their behaviours. METHODS/

designIn this two-group, pragmatic randomised controlled trial, men aged 18-50 years residing in Australia who have been in an adult intimate relationship (female, male or non-binary partner) in the past 12 months are eligible. Men who report being worried about their behaviour or have had others express concerns about their behaviour towards a partner in the past 12 months will be randomised with a 1:1 allocation ratio to receive the BETTER MAN website or a comparator website (basic healthy relationships information). The BETTER MAN intervention includes self-directed, interactive reflection activities spread across three modules: Better Relationships, Better Values and Better Communication, with a final "action plan" of strategies and resources. Using an intention to treat approach, the primary analysis will estimate between-group difference in the proportion of men who report undertaking help-seeking behaviours for relationship issues in the last 6 months, at 6 months post-baseline. Analysis of secondary outcomes will estimate between-group differences in: (i) mean score of awareness of behaviours in relationships as abusive immediately post-use of website; (ii) mean score on readiness to change immediately post-use of website and 3 months after baseline; and (iii) cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate the effectiveness of an online healthy relationship tool for men who may use IPV. BETTER MAN could be incorporated into practice in community and health settings, providing an evidence-informed website to assist men to seek help to promote healthy relationships and reduce use of IPV.

trial registrationACTRN12622000786796 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: 2 June 2022. Version: 1 (28 September 2023).

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceAdultAnxietyAustraliaFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMenPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDigital interventionDomestic violencePerpetrators

Identifiers

PMID38042810
PMCPMC10693163
OpenAlexW4389272887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.