Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38042774›Full record

ReviewJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2023

Ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review.

Jimlea Nadezhda Mendoza, Natalia Hanazaki, Baiba Prūse, Agnese Martini, Maria Viktoria Bittner, Sophia Kochalski, Edison Macusi, Aimee Ciriaco, Giulia Mattalia, Renata Sõukand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jimlea Nadezhda MendozaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy. 874061@stud.unive.it.
Natalia HanazakiDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Baiba PrūseAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Agnese MartiniDepartment of Asian and North African Studies, Ca Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Maria Viktoria BittnerDepartment of Asian and North African Studies, Ca Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Sophia KochalskiCRETUS, Department of Applied Economics, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Edison MacusiFaculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Davao Oriental State University, Mati, Philippines.
Aimee CiriacoTagalog Fisher Community of Mabato Asufre Pangil, Pangil, Laguna, Philippines.
Giulia MattaliaInstitut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ICTA-UAB), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.
Renata SõukandDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthnobotanical knowledge about the role of plants in fisheries provides valuable ecological information vital for sustainable management of local resources; however, it is diluted and understudied globally. This literature review aims to map the knowledge of plant use within traditional fishing communities.

methodsThrough the PRISMA method, we identified and selected 34 articles reporting the use of plants in fisheries, and including 344 taxa of plants and algae. Uses of plants and algae were grouped into different categories.

resultsIn the novel categorization of fishery-related uses we proposed, the most mentioned were for fishing and building/repair of fishing artifacts and habitat-related uses, while the records of plants related to fiber uses, providing aid in fishing management and species causing problems, were among the least mentioned. Semi-structured interview is most commonly used with local resource users, especially fishery experts, in exploring perceptions on plant use within traditional fishing communities. Diversity was high in all the recorded families, but most were reported locally.

conclusionEthnobotanical studies with fishers are not common in the documented literature but they provide a large number of use reports. On the basis this review, in most of the world, the information is of a casual and sporadic nature. Fishers can provide information on aquatic plants and algae that create problems and aid in fishing management, which are crucial in understanding the ecosystem of a region experiencing environmental challenges. This knowledge is greatly understudied globally and undergoing a rapid decline, as highlighted in several of the reviewed articles. Thus, further systematic research on fishery-related uses of plants by fisherfolk is needed considering its potential contribution to the sustainable management of fishery resources.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEthnobotanyFisheriesHumansHuntingEthnobiologyFisherfolkIndigenous plant knowledgeLocal ecological knowledgePlant usesTraditional ecological knowledgeTraditional fisheries knowledgeTraditional plant knowledge

Identifiers

PMID38042774
PMCPMC10693712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.