Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38042768›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

General practitioner perceptions and experiences of managing perinatal mental health: a scoping review.

Jacqueline Frayne, Sarah Seddon, Tamara Lebedevs, Talila Milroy, Beverly Teh, Thinh Nguyen

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Making decisions about antidepressant use during pregnancy: a qualitative interview study of a sample of women in the UK.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline FrayneMedical School, Discipline of General practice, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia. Jacqueline.frayne@uwa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4420-3753
Sarah SeddonMedical School, Discipline of General practice, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-9543
Tamara LebedevsPharmacy Department, Women's and Newborn Health Service, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5282-4605
Talila MilroyMedical School, Discipline of General practice, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Beverly TehSouth Metropolitan Health Services, Perth, Australia.
Thinh NguyenPeel and Rockingham Kwinana Mental Health Services, Rockingham, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5669-7797
The University of Western Australia · AUKing Edward Memorial Hospital · AUNorth Metropolitan Health Service · AU

Funding

Therapeutics Guidelines Ltd and the RACGP Foundation 2021/GR001004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral Practitioners (GPs) are involved in preconception, pregnancy, and postnatal care. Overall, mental health remains a significant contributor to disease burden affecting 1 in 4 pregnant women. Psychotropic medication prescribing occurs in almost 1 in 12 pregnancies, and appears to be increasing, along with the prevalence of mental health disorders in women of reproductive age. Perinatal mental health management is therefore not an unlikely scenario within their clinical practice. This scoping review aims to map current research related to GPs perceptions and experiences of managing perinatal mental health.

methodA comprehensive search strategy using nine electronic databases, and grey literature was undertaken between December 2021 and February 2023. Relevant studies were sourced from peer review databases using key terms related to perinatal mental health and general practitioners. Search results were screened on title, abstract and full text to assess those meeting inclusion criteria and relevance to the research question.

resultsAfter screening, 16 articles were included in the scoping review. The majority focused on perinatal depression. Findings support that GPs express confidence with diagnosing perinatal depression but report issues of stigma navigating a diagnosis. Over the last two decades, prescribing confidence in perinatal mental health remains variable with concerns for the safety profile of medication, low level of confidence in providing information and a strong reliance on personal experience. Despite the establishment of perinatal guidelines by countries, the utilisation of these and other existing resources by GPs appears from current literature to be infrequent. Many challenges exist for GPs around time pressures, a lack of information and resources, and difficulty accessing referral to services.

conclusionRecommendations following this scoping review include targeted perinatal education programs specific for GPs and embedded within training programs and the development of practice guidelines and resources specific to general practice that recognises time, services, and funding limitations. To achieve this future research is first needed on how guidelines and resources can be developed and best delivered to optimise GP engagement to improve knowledge and enhance patient care.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersMental DisordersFemaleHumansMental HealthPregnancyPregnant PeopleGeneral practicePerinatal mental healthPsychotropic medicationScoping review

Identifiers

PMID38042768
PMCPMC10693076
OpenAlexW4389263519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.