Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38042524›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2024

Time-Trends in Food Insecurity Among US-Born and Foreign-Born Hispanic Adults by Language Use: An Analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data, 1999-2018.

Miguel Ángel López, Melissa Fuster, Julia Fleckman, Amy George, M Pia Chaparro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel Ángel LópezDepartment of Social, Behavioral and Population Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana; Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, Nebraska. Electronic address: mlopez@centerfornutrition.org.
Melissa FusterDepartment of Social, Behavioral and Population Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Julia FleckmanDepartment of Social, Behavioral and Population Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Amy GeorgeDepartment of Spanish and Portuguese, School of Liberal Arts, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
M Pia ChaparroDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Tulane University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Tulane-Xavier Minority Training in International HealthT37MD001424 · NIMHD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI OBERHELMAN, RICHARD A, THEALL, KATHERINE P · 2005 to 2022
$3.4M
NIMHD NIH HHS T37 MD001424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, food insecurity prevalence has been higher in Hispanic households than in non-Hispanic White households. Food insecurity prevalence among Hispanic adults, US-born and foreign-born, may vary by language use.

objectiveTo explore whether or not the relationship between language use and food insecurity varied over time (1999-2018) among US-born and foreign-born Hispanic adults.

designTrends analysis and multivariable logistic regression modeling using pooled cross-sectional data. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingFifteen thousand sixty-two Hispanic adults participating in the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2018).

main outcome measuresFood insecurity prevalence, assessed with the US Household Food Security Survey Module. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Unadjusted food insecurity trends from 1999 to 2018 by language use (mostly English, both languages equally, or mostly Spanish) among US-born and foreign-born Hispanic adults were analyzed using piecewise-linear regression of log prevalence rates. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and with an interaction term between language use and time were used to determine if odds of food insecurity among US-born and foreign-born Hispanic adults varied by language use between 1999 and 2018.

resultsHispanic adults' food insecurity prevalence followed an upward linear trend from 1999 to 2018; this was significant for US-born mostly English-speakers (P < 0.001), US-born mostly Spanish-speakers (P = 0.013), and foreign-born mostly Spanish-speakers (P < 0.001). In fully adjusted logistic regression models, foreign-born Hispanic adults who spoke both languages equally (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.6) and those who spoke mostly Spanish (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.8) had significantly higher food insecurity odds, compared with mostly English-speakers. No variations in associations across time were observed between language use and food insecurity (interaction P value > 0.1).

conclusionsHispanic adults' unadjusted food insecurity trends from 1999 to 2018 varied by language use. When adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and compared with mostly English-speakers, food insecurity odds were significantly higher only among foreign-born Hispanic adults who spoke either both languages equally or mostly Spanish. Food assistance programs should linguistically adapt their services for Hispanic adults.

Indexed as

Food InsecurityFood SupplyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNutrition SurveysPrevalenceUnited StatesEconomicsFood insecurityHispanicLinguistic gradientLinguistic isolation

Identifiers

PMID38042524
PMCPMC11032228
OpenAlexW4389160512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.