Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38042249›Full record

ReviewProgress in neurobiology2024

Nanoparticle-mediated delivery of non-viral gene editing technology to the brain.

Lucian Williams, Jessica Larsen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Targeted editing of CCL5 with CRISPR-Cas9 nanoparticles enhances breast cancer immunotherapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025
    Article
  5. Efficient gene delivery admitted by small metabolites specifically targeting astrocytes in the mouse brain.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Emerging Perspectives on Prime Editor Delivery to the Brain.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucian WilliamsDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29631, USA.
Jessica LarsenDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29631, USA; Department of Chemical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29631, USA. Electronic address: larsenj@clemson.edu.
Clemson University · US

Funding

Statistical Methods for Gene Regulatory Analysis From Single Cell Genomics DataP20GM139769 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, ARNO, GAVIN · 2021 to 2025
$10.8M
Genetic Basis of Lifespan and Healthspan Extension by ACE Inhibition in DrosophilaR01AG073181 · NIA · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI Robert R. H Anholt, MARIA DE LUCA · 2022 to 2026
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM139769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurological disorders pose a significant burden on individuals and society, affecting millions worldwide. These disorders, including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Huntington's disease, often have limited treatment options and can lead to progressive degeneration and disability. Gene editing technologies, including Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFN), Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALEN), and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-associated Protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9), offer a promising avenue for potential cures by targeting and correcting the underlying genetic mutations responsible for neurologic disorders. However, efficient delivery methods are crucial for the successful application of gene editing technologies in the context of neurological disorders. The central nervous system presents unique challenges to treatment development due to the blood-brain barrier, which restricts the entry of large molecules. While viral vectors are traditionally used for gene delivery, nonviral delivery methods, such as nanoparticle-mediated delivery, offer safer alternatives that can efficiently transport gene editing components. Herein we aim to introduce the three main gene editing nucleases as nonviral treatments for neurologic disorders, the delivery barriers associated with brain targeting, and the current nonviral techniques used for brain-specific delivery. We highlight the challenges and opportunities for future research in this exciting and growing field that could lead to blood-brain barrier bypassing therapeutic gene editing.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesParkinson DiseaseBrainGene EditingGenetic TherapyHumansBlood-brain barrierGene editing technologiesGenome editingNon-viral vectors

Identifiers

PMID38042249
PMCPMC10872436
OpenAlexW4389208367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.