Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38042130›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2024

Impacts of sex differences on optogenetic, chemogenetic, and calcium-imaging tools.

Valentina I Cea Salazar, Melvin D Perez, A J Robison, Brian C Trainor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valentina I Cea SalazarNeuroscience Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Melvin D PerezDepartment of Physiology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
A J RobisonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Brian C TrainorNeuroscience Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. Electronic address: bctrainor@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

Projection-specific gene expression in resilience to chronic stressR01MH111604 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Michelle Suzanne Mazei-Robison, ALFRED J ROBISON · 2016 to 2026
$4.9M
Training Program in Basic NeuroscienceT32MH082174 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI W MARTIN USREY · 2007 to 2026
$3.1M
Transcriptional mechanisms in mast cells underlying immune function and diseaseR01AI168014 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Adam Moeser, ALFRED J ROBISON · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Supplement: Oxytocin-department circuits of social approach and vigilanceR01MH121829 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TRAINOR, BRIAN C · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
UC Davis Advancing Diversity in the Neuroscience Research (ADNR) ProgramR25NS112130 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI USREY, W MARTIN · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI168014NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111604NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121829NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082174NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS112130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technical innovation in neuroscience introduced powerful tools for measuring and manipulating neuronal activity via optical, chemogenetic, and calcium-imaging tools. These tools were initially tested primarily in male animals but are now increasingly being used in females as well. In this review, we consider how these tools may work differently in males and females. For example, we review sex differences in the metabolism of chemogenetic ligands and their downstream signaling effects. Optical tools more directly alter depolarization or hyperpolarization of neurons, but biological sex and gonadal hormones modulate synaptic inputs and intrinsic excitability. We review studies demonstrating that optogenetic manipulations are sometimes consistent across the rodent estrous cycle but within certain circuits; manipulations can vary across the ovarian cycle. Finally, calcium-imaging methods utilize genetically encoded calcium indicators to measure neuronal activity. Testosterone and estradiol can directly modulate calcium influx, and we consider these implications for interpreting the results of calcium-imaging studies. Together, our findings suggest that these neuroscientific tools may sometimes work differently in males and females and that users should be aware of these differences when applying these methods.

Indexed as

CalciumNeurosciencesAnimalsFemaleMaleNeuronsOptogeneticsSex CharacteristicsCalcium

Identifiers

PMID38042130
PMCPMC11374099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.