Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38041724›Full record

ArticleActa parasitologica2024

PCR-Based Screening of Pathogens in Bombus terrestris Populations of Turkey.

Ali Sevim, Rahşan Akpınar, Seyit Hasan Öztürk, Fatih Yılmaz, Ümit Kayaboynu, Elif Sevim, Hasan Ese, Ümit Karataş, Mücahit Buldağ, Şinasi Umur

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta parasitologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of Pathogens in Bumblebee Decline: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ali SevimDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, 40100, Turkey. ali.sevim@ahievran.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2472-599X
Rahşan AkpınarHoneybee Diseases Laboratory, T.C Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Samsun Veterinary Control Institute, Samsun, Turkey.
Seyit Hasan ÖztürkT.C Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ordu Apiculture Research Institute, Ordu, Turkey.
Fatih YılmazT.C Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ordu Apiculture Research Institute, Ordu, Turkey.
Ümit KayaboynuT.C Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ordu Apiculture Research Institute, Ordu, Turkey.
Elif SevimDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, 40100, Turkey.
Hasan EseT.C Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ordu Apiculture Research Institute, Ordu, Turkey.
Ümit KarataşT.C Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ordu Apiculture Research Institute, Ordu, Turkey.
Mücahit BuldağT.C Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ordu Apiculture Research Institute, Ordu, Turkey.
Şinasi UmurDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Ahi Evran University · TROndokuz Mayıs University · TRSamsun University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBumblebees are an important group of insects in the pollination of various vegetables, fruits, oilseeds, legumes, and the fodder crops. Compared to honeybees, they have a wider choice of hosts and a longer flight period. These bees are used especially for the pollination of plants in greenhouses and are commercially produced for this purpose. Recently, serious decreases have been occurring in bumblebee populations due to various reasons such as pathogens, and some of species are even threatened with extinction. Due to the worldwide decline in pollinator insects, determining the distribution and prevalence of bumblebee pathogens is of great importance. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the incidence and prevalence of pathogens in Turkish bumblebee populations and how much of each pathogen was in bumblebee samples.

methodsA total of 172 Bombus terrestris (Linnaeus,1758) samples (21 samples from commercial enterprises, 79 samples from greenhouses and 72 samples from nature) were randomly collected from 3 provinces (Antalya, Mersin and İzmir) where greenhouse cultivation is intensively carried out in Turkey. Eighty-nine of these samples were collected in the spring and eighty-three in the autumn. The presence of four pathogens (Nosema bombi, Crithidia bombi, Apicystis bombi, and Locustacarus buchneri) was investigated by PCR using universal primers.

resultsThe overall prevalence of Nosema bombi, Crithidia bombi, Apicystis bombi, and Locustacarus buchneri was determined as 7.55%, 9.3%, 11.62%, and 4.65%, respectively. Co-infections (5.81%) were only detected in wild-caught (nature) samples. C. bombi and A. bombi infections were detected at higher rates in the spring samples than in the autumn samples (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the spring and autumn samples with respect to the presence of N. bombi and L. buchneri (p > 0.05).

conclusionThe results obtained could be important in determining the prevalence and spread rates of the bumblebee diseases in Turkey and to determine appropriate protection measures. The information gathered should increase our knowledge about the presence of these pathogens in Turkey and could contribute to improve apiarist's practice. More studies are needed to determine the transmission pathways of these pathogens between the populations. Also, complex pathogen interactions in bumblebee populations should be considered in the future to improve bumblebee health.

Indexed as

Polymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsBeesCrithidiaNosemaTurkeyBumblebeeParasitePathogenPCRPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID38041724
OpenAlexW4389267082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.