Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38041695›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2023

AI prediction of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for ureteral stones by machine learning-based analysis with a variety of stone and patient characteristics.

Yukako Nakamae, Ryusuke Deguchi, Mitsutaka Nemoto, Yuichi Kimura, Shimpei Yamashita, Yasuo Kohjimoto, Isao Hara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yukako NakamaeGraduate School of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Kinokawa City, Japan.
Ryusuke DeguchiDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama City, Japan.
Mitsutaka NemotoGraduate School of Biology-Oriented Science and Technology, Kindai University, Kinokawa City, Japan. nemoto@waka.kindai.ac.jp.
Yuichi KimuraFaculty of Informatics, Kindai University, Higashiosaka, Japan.
Shimpei YamashitaDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama City, Japan.
Yasuo KohjimotoDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama City, Japan.
Isao HaraDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama City, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose an artificial intelligence prediction method for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment outcomes by analysis of a wide variety of variables. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 171 patients from between January 2009 and November 2019 that underwent shock wave lithotripsy at Wakayama Medical University, Japan, for ureteral stones shown on preoperative non-contrast computed tomography. This prediction method consisted of stone area extraction, stone analyzing factor extraction from non-contrast computed tomography images, and shock wave lithotripsy treatment result prediction by a non-linear support vector machine for analysis of 15 input and automatic measurement factors. Input factors included patient age, skin-to-stone distance, and maximum ureteral wall thickness, and the automatic measurement factors included 11 non-contrast computed tomography image texture factors in the stone area and stone volume. Permutation feature importance was also applied to the artificial intelligence prediction results to analyze the importance of each factor relating to estimate decision grounds. The prediction performance was evaluated by five-fold cross-validation, it obtained 0.742 of the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The proposed method is shown by these results to have robust data diversity and effective clinical application. As a result of permutation feature importance, some factors that showed high p-values in the significant difference tests were thought to have a high contribution to the proposed prediction method. Future issues include validation using a larger volume of high-resolution clinical non-contrast computed tomography image data and the application of deep learning.

Indexed as

LithotripsyUreteral CalculiArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArtificial intelligencePermutation feature importanceShock wave lithotripsySupport vector machineUreteral stone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.