Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38041551›Full record

SynthesisNutrition reviews2024

Why do mothers mix milk feed their infants? Results from a systematic review.

Carmen Monge-Montero, Liandré F van der Merwe, Silvia Tagliamonte, Carlo Agostoni, Paola Vitaglione

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pumps: A Possible Tool to Promote More Equitable Lactation Outcomes.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carmen Monge-MonteroDepartment of Research, Monge Consultancy Food and Nutrition Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1259-6505
Liandré F van der MerweDanone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Silvia TagliamonteDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Carlo AgostoniFondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Pediatric Clinic, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5006-0832
Paola VitaglioneDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6608-5209

Funding

Danone Nutricia ResearchMinistry of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextCombining or supplementing breastfeeding with formula feeding, also called mixed milk feeding (MMF), is a common infant feeding practice. However, there is no well-established MMF evidence-base for informing and guiding parents. A better understanding of the reasons why mothers practice MMF may facilitate identification of efficient strategies for supporting exclusive breastfeeding, and/or opportunities to prolong breastfeeding, at least partially.

objectiveAn updated systematic literature review was undertaken with the primary aim of gaining a deeper understanding of the reasons why mothers choose MMF. DATA SOURCES: Six databases were searched for relevant articles published in English from January 2012 to January 2022. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently performed the screenings and data extraction, and any differences were resolved by a third reviewer. Data from 138 articles were included, 90 of which contained data on MMF reasons/drivers, and 60 contained data on infant age and/or maternal demographic factors associated with MMF. DATA ANALYSIS: A total of 13 different unique MMF drivers/reasons were identified and categorized according to whether the drivers/reasons related to perceived choice, necessity, or pressure. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool of Diverse Studies and the JBI Systematic Reviews tool. Several different terms were used to describe and classify MMF across the studies. The most commonly reported reasons for MMF were related to a perception of necessity (39% of drivers, eg, concerns about infant's hunger/perceived breast milk insufficiency or breastfeeding difficulties), followed by drivers associated with perceived choice (34%; eg, having more flexibility) and perceived pressure (25%; eg, returning to work or healthcare professionals' advice). This was particularly true for infants aged 3 months or younger.

conclusionThe key global drivers for MMF and their distribution across infant age and regions were identified and described, providing opportunities for the provision of optimal breastfeeding support. A unified definition of MMF is needed in order to enable more comparable and standardized research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022304253.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingInfant FormulaMothersAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMilk, Humanbreast-feedingconsumer behaviorinfant feedingmixed milk feedingmothers

Identifiers

PMID38041551
PMCPMC11384123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.