ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2024
Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model of sparsentan to evaluate drug-drug interaction potential.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the real-world safety of sparsentan for immunoglobulin A nephropathy: insights from a comprehensive analysis of FAERS database.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Advancing Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction with Biomimetic Improvements: Leveraging the Latest Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Guide Researchers in the Field.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Assessing Cytochrome P450 Drug Interaction Risk for Dordaviprone Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model of sparsentan to evaluate drug-drug interaction potential.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sparsentan is a dual endothelin/angiotensin II receptor antagonist indicated to reduce proteinuria in patients with primary IgA nephropathy at high risk of disease progression. In vitro data indicate that sparsentan is likely to inhibit or induce various CYP enzymes at therapeutic concentrations. Sparsentan as a victim and perpetrator of CYP3A4 mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) has been assessed clinically. A mechanistic, bottom-up, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PK) model for sparsentan was developed based on in vitro data of drug solubility, formulation dissolution and particle size, drug permeability, inhibition and induction of metabolic enzymes, and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) driven efflux. The model was verified using clinical PK data from healthy adult volunteers administered single and multiple doses in the fasted and fed states for a wide range of sparsentan doses. The model was also verified by simulation of clinically observed DDIs. The verified model was then used to test various DDI simulations of sparsentan as a perpetrator and victim of CYP3A4 using an expanded set of inducers and inhibitors with varying potency. Additional perpetrator and victim DDI simulations were performed using probes for CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Simulations were conducted to predict the effect of complete inhibition of P-gp inhibition on sparsentan absorption and clearance. The predictive simulations indicated that exposure of sparsentan could increase greater than two-fold if co-administered with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, such as itraconazole. Other potential DDI interactions as victim or perpetrator were all within two-fold of control. The effect of complete P-gp inhibition on sparsentan PK was negligible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.