ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2023
Pregnancy with Intrauterine Device Perforation: A Case Report.
Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cystoscopic retrieval of a migrated IUD with bladder stone formation during pregnancy termination: a Case Report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although intrauterine devices (IUDs) are known for their low failure rate in pregnancy prevention, potential risks associated with their use include uterine perforation and migration through the abdomen. In this particular case, the patient experienced simultaneous IUD failure and perforation, with the device becoming embedded in an omentum. A 28-year-old woman who was 39 weeks plus one day gestation presented for caesarean section. During the caesarean section, it was discovered that the IUD had entered the omentum through a hole in the posterior part of the uterus. The result of the birth was a live boy. IUD perforation is most commonly observed during the insertion procedure; however, it may rarely occur at a later stage. IUD perforations are frequently asymptomatic and remain undetected until follow-up assessments are conducted or clinical manifestations become apparent. The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms is commonly observed in cases with intraperitoneal migration of the IUD. Although the occurrence of abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and fever with a missing IUD are indicative, they may not always be present. Nonspecific signs and symptoms lead to misdiagnosis and the consequent delay in initiating appropriate treatment. In the present case, the co-occurrence of IUD embedded in the omentum and pregnancy posed a challenge due to the device's rapid and imprecise shift, which complicated its accurate localisation. In such scenarios, ultrasonographic guidance can serve as a valuable tool to enhance accuracy and decrease adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.