Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38041241›Full record

ArticleCancer science2024

BRCA1/2 reversion mutations in a pan-cancer cohort.

Kohei Nakamura, Hideyuki Hayashi, Ryutaro Kawano, Marin Ishikawa, Eriko Aimono, Takaaki Mizuno, Hajime Kuroda, Yasuyuki Kojima, Naoki Niikura, Aya Kawanishi and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Surgical case reports · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Kohei NakamuraGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5162-7132
Hideyuki HayashiGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4974-8015
Ryutaro KawanoGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Marin IshikawaGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Eriko AimonoGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takaaki MizunoGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hajime KurodaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Adachi Medical Center, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuyuki KojimaShowa University Institute for Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki NiikuraDepartment of Breast Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Aya KawanishiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Kei TakeshitaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Japan.
Shinsuke SuzukiCancer Center, Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Shinichi UenoCancer Center, Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Kosuke OkuwakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Jiichiro SasakiDivision of Clinical Oncology, Department of Comprehensive Medicine, Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4353-4382
Masatoshi YamaguchiDivision of Clinical Genetics, University of Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.
Kenta MasudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuyuki ChiyodaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8214-2242
Wataru YamagamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Chihiro OkadaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Communication Engineering Center, Electronic Systems Business Group, Mitsubishi Electric Software Co., Ltd., Amagasaki, Japan.
Sachio NoharaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Communication Engineering Center, Electronic Systems Business Group, Mitsubishi Electric Software Co., Ltd., Amagasaki, Japan.
Shigeki TanishimaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Communication Engineering Center, Electronic Systems Business Group, Mitsubishi Electric Software Co., Ltd., Amagasaki, Japan.
Hiroshi NishiharaGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5460-8703
Keio University · JPMitsubishi Electric (Japan) · JPKagoshima University Hospital · JPKitasato University · JPTokai University · JPShowa University · JPTokai University Hospital · JPTokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center · JPUniversity of Miyazaki Hospital · JP

Funding

Cell Science Research FoundationJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP22ck0106872Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K08829Kanzawa Medical Research FoundationTakeda Science FoundationUehara Memorial Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor sensitivity to platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapy and poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors is increased by homologous recombination deficiency-causing mutations; in particular, reversion mutations cause drug resistance by restoring protein function. Treatment response is predicted by breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2) mutations; however, BRCA1/2 reversion mutations have not been comprehensively studied in pan-cancer cohorts. We aimed to characterize BRCA1/2 reversion mutations in a large pan-cancer cohort of Japanese patients by retrospectively analyzing sequencing data for BRCA1/2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations in 3738 patients with 32 cancer types. We identified somatic mutations in tumors or circulating cell-free DNA that could restore the ORF of adverse alleles, including reversion mutations. We identified 12 (0.32%) patients with somatic BRCA1 (n = 3) and BRCA2 (n = 9) reversion mutations in breast (n = 4), ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal (n = 4), pancreatic (n = 2), prostate (n = 1), and gallbladder (n = 1) cancers. We identified 21 reversion events-BRCA1 (n = 3), BRCA2 (n = 18)-including eight pure deletions, one single-nucleotide variant, six multinucleotide variants, and six deletion-insertions. Seven (33.3%) reversion deletions showed a microhomology length greater than 1 bp, suggesting microhomology-mediated end-join repair. Disease course data were obtained for all patients with reversion events: four patients acquired mutations after PARP-inhibitor treatment failure, two showed somatic reversion mutations after disease progression, following Pt-based treatment, five showed mutations after both treatments, one patient with pancreatic cancer and BRCA1 reversion mutations had no history of either treatment. Although reversion mutations commonly occur in BRCA-associated cancers, our findings suggest that reversion mutations due to Pt-chemotherapy might be correlated with BRCA1/2-mediated tumorigenesis even in non-BRCA-associated histologies.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleMutationPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesRetrospective StudiesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesBRCA1/2homologous recombination deficiencyPARP inhibitorplatinum-based chemotherapyreversion mutation

Identifiers

PMID38041241
PMCPMC10859608
OpenAlexW4389274118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.