ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2023
Using theory of change to co-create a programme theory for a telerehabilitation intervention for pain management in people with haemophilia.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Logic Models on Health Information Technology-Related Interventions: Scoping Review Across Disciplines.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Demystifying programme theories of co-production in health and welfare: An interview study on new researchers' systems perspectives.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Exercise-based telerehabilitation for the management of chronic pain in people with severe haemophilia: a mixed-methods feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImproved approaches for chronic pain management are a clinical and research priority for people with haemophilia (PWH). Involving people with lived experience in the design of a complex rehabilitation intervention strengthens the credibility and plausibility of the intervention, particularly in relation to rare disorders. Here we describe using a 'Theory of Change' (ToC) dialogue-based stakeholder process to create a programme theory for a telerehabilitation intervention.
methodsAn online workshop was convened and stakeholders received a briefing document in advance. Five stakeholders took part (3 PWH and 2 physiotherapists). At the workshop the group first agreed the overall aim of the intervention. Discussions then identified the resources, activities, barriers and enablers needed to achieve this outcome. All discussions were recorded and annotated by the workshop moderator. Behaviour change techniques were mapped for inclusion in the theory.
resultsA programme theory and narrative report were produced. All stakeholders reviewed these for clarity and to ensure a true reflection of the workshop discussions. Agreement was based on how meaningful, well-defined, do-able, plausible, credible, and testable each component was. Stakeholders highlighted the importance of issues unique to PWH. Key components included the need for physiotherapists to be knowledgeable of the condition, a range of exercises that were inclusive of all abilities, and the need for people to feel safe and supported whilst taking part.
conclusionsCo-developed theory based approaches to intervention design offer an inclusive and transparent way to develop novel and meaningful interventions for people with complex health conditions. The ToC is wholly transparent in its design and content. Together with the identified behaviour change techniques, the theory informs the protocol for a feasibility study evaluating a telerehabilitation intervention. Importantly, it allows the opportunity to revise, adapt and improve the programme theory for further implementation and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.