Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38041177›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

Dysnatremia at ICU admission and functional outcome of cardiac arrest: insights from four randomised controlled trials.

Jean Baptiste Lascarrou, Cyrielle Ermel, Alain Cariou, Timo Laitio, Hans Kirkegaard, Eldar Søreide, Anders M Grejs, Matti Reinikainen, Gwenhael Colin, Fabio Silvio Taccone and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01994772 (Therapeutic Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest in Non Shockable Rhythm at Rescue Arrival), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01994772 nacompletednot on this map

Therapeutic Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest in Non Shockable Rhythm at Rescue Arrival: The HYPERION Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Departemental VendeeRan2014 to 2018Enrolled584ConditionsCardiac ArrestArmsTargeted controlled temperature between 32.5 and 33.5°C, Targeted controlled temperature between 36.5 and 37.5°C
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jean Baptiste LascarrouNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Movement - Interactions - Performance, MIP, UR 4334, 44000, Nantes, France. jeanbaptiste.lascarrou@chu-nantes.fr.
Cyrielle ErmelMédecine Intensive Reanimation, University Hospital Centre, Nantes, France.
Alain CariouAfterROSC Network, Nantes, France.
Timo LaitioDivision of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Hans KirkegaardResearch Centre for Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Eldar SøreideIntensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology, Stavanger University Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Anders M GrejsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Matti ReinikainenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Gwenhael ColinAfterROSC Network, Nantes, France.
Fabio Silvio TacconeAfterROSC Network, Nantes, France.
Amélie Le GougeINSERM CIC 1415, CHRU Tours, Tours, France.
Markus B SkrifvarsDepartment of Emergency Care and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the potential association between early dysnatremia and 6-month functional outcome after cardiac arrest.

methodsWe pooled data from four randomised clinical trials in post-cardiac-arrest patients admitted to the ICU with coma after stable return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Admission natremia was categorised as normal (135-145 mmol/L), low, or high. We analysed associations between natremia category and Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2 at 6 months, with and without adjustment on the modified Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis Score (mCAHP).

resultsWe included 1163 patients (581 from HYPERION, 352 from TTH48, 120 from COMACARE, and 110 from Xe-HYPOTHECA) with a mean age of 63 ± 13 years and a predominance of males (72.5%). A cardiac cause was identified in 63.6% of cases. Median time from collapse to ROSC was 20 [15-29] minutes. Overall, mean natremia on ICU admission was 137.5 ± 4.7 mmol/L; 211 (18.6%) and 31 (2.7%) patients had hyponatremia and hypernatremia, respectively. By univariate analysis, CPC 1 or 2 at 6 months was significantly less common in the group with hyponatremia (50/211 [24%] vs. 363/893 [41%]; P = 0.001); the mCAHP-adjusted odds ratio was 0.45 (95%CI 0.26-0.79, p = 0.005). The number of patients with hypernatremia was too small for a meaningful multivariable analysis.

conclusionsEarly hyponatremia was common in patients with ROSC after cardiac arrest and was associated with a poorer 6-month functional outcome. The mechanisms underlying this association remain to be elucidated in order to determine whether interventions targeting hyponatremia are worth investigating. Registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01994772, November 2013, 21.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationHeart ArrestHypernatremiaHyponatremiaOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCardiac arrestFunctional outcomeNatremiaOsmolalitySurvival

Identifiers

PMID38041177
PMCPMC10693108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.