Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38041056›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Dancing the Nanopore limbo - Nanopore metagenomics from small DNA quantities for bacterial genome reconstruction.

Sophie A Simon, Katharina Schmidt, Lea Griesdorn, André R Soares, Till L V Bornemann, Alexander J Probst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie A SimonEnvironmental Metagenomics, Faculty of Chemistry, Research Center One Health Ruhr of the University Alliance Ruhr, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. sophie.simon@uni-due.de.
Katharina SchmidtEnvironmental Metagenomics, Faculty of Chemistry, Research Center One Health Ruhr of the University Alliance Ruhr, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Lea GriesdornEnvironmental Metagenomics, Faculty of Chemistry, Research Center One Health Ruhr of the University Alliance Ruhr, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
André R SoaresEnvironmental Metagenomics, Faculty of Chemistry, Research Center One Health Ruhr of the University Alliance Ruhr, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Till L V BornemannEnvironmental Metagenomics, Faculty of Chemistry, Research Center One Health Ruhr of the University Alliance Ruhr, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Alexander J ProbstEnvironmental Metagenomics, Faculty of Chemistry, Research Center One Health Ruhr of the University Alliance Ruhr, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. alexander.probst@uni-due.de.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile genome-resolved metagenomics has revolutionized our understanding of microbial and genetic diversity in environmental samples, assemblies of short-reads often result in incomplete and/or highly fragmented metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), hampering in-depth genomics. Although Nanopore sequencing has increasingly been used in microbial metagenomics as long reads greatly improve the assembly quality of MAGs, the recommended DNA quantity usually exceeds the recoverable amount of DNA of environmental samples. Here, we evaluated lower-than-recommended DNA quantities for Nanopore library preparation by determining sequencing quality, community composition, assembly quality and recovery of MAGs.

resultsWe generated 27 Nanopore metagenomes using the commercially available ZYMO mock community and varied the amount of input DNA from 1000 ng (the recommended minimum) down to 1 ng in eight steps. The quality of the generated reads remained stable across all input levels. The read mapping accuracy, which reflects how well the reads match a known reference genome, was consistently high across all libraries. The relative abundance of the species in the metagenomes was stable down to input levels of 50 ng. High-quality MAGs (> 95% completeness, ≤ 5% contamination) could be recovered from metagenomes down to 35 ng of input material. When combined with publicly available Illumina reads for the mock community, Nanopore reads from input quantities as low as 1 ng improved the quality of hybrid assemblies.

conclusionOur results show that the recommended DNA amount for Nanopore library preparation can be substantially reduced without any adverse effects to genome recovery and still bolster hybrid assemblies when combined with short-read data. We posit that the results presented herein will enable studies to improve genome recovery from low-biomass environments, enhancing microbiome understanding.

Indexed as

DancingNanoporesDNAGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeMetagenomicsSequence Analysis, DNADNAGenomicsHybrid assemblyLong readsLow-biomassLow DNA inputNanopore sequencingProkaryotes

Identifiers

PMID38041056
PMCPMC10693096
OpenAlexW4389223334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.