Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38041041›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

AI and semantic ontology for personalized activity eCoaching in healthy lifestyle recommendations: a meta-heuristic approach.

Ayan Chatterjee, Nibedita Pahari, Andreas Prinz, Michael Riegler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ayan ChatterjeeDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, Centre for E-Health, University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway. ayan.chatterjee@uia.no.
Nibedita PahariDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Kolkata, India.
Andreas PrinzDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, Centre for E-Health, University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway.
Michael RieglerDepartment of Holistic Systems, Simula Metropolitan Center for Digital Engineering (SimulaMet), Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomated coaches (eCoach) can help people lead a healthy lifestyle (e.g., reduction of sedentary bouts) with continuous health status monitoring and personalized recommendation generation with artificial intelligence (AI). Semantic ontology can play a crucial role in knowledge representation, data integration, and information retrieval.

methodsThis study proposes a semantic ontology model to annotate the AI predictions, forecasting outcomes, and personal preferences to conceptualize a personalized recommendation generation model with a hybrid approach. This study considers a mixed activity projection method that takes individual activity insights from the univariate time-series prediction and ensemble multi-class classification approaches. We have introduced a way to improve the prediction result with a residual error minimization (REM) technique and make it meaningful in recommendation presentation with a Naïve-based interval prediction approach. We have integrated the activity prediction results in an ontology for semantic interpretation. A SPARQL query protocol and RDF Query Language (SPARQL) have generated personalized recommendations in an understandable format. Moreover, we have evaluated the performance of the time-series prediction and classification models against standard metrics on both imbalanced and balanced public PMData and private MOX2-5 activity datasets. We have used Adaptive Synthetic (ADASYN) to generate synthetic data from the minority classes to avoid bias. The activity datasets were collected from healthy adults (n = 16 for public datasets; n = 15 for private datasets). The standard ensemble algorithms have been used to investigate the possibility of classifying daily physical activity levels into the following activity classes: sedentary (0), low active (1), active (2), highly active (3), and rigorous active (4). The daily step count, low physical activity (LPA), medium physical activity (MPA), and vigorous physical activity (VPA) serve as input for the classification models. Subsequently, we re-verify the classifiers on the private MOX2-5 dataset. The performance of the ontology has been assessed with reasoning and SPARQL query execution time. Additionally, we have verified our ontology for effective recommendation generation.

resultsWe have tested several standard AI algorithms and selected the best-performing model with optimized configuration for our use case by empirical testing. We have found that the autoregression model with the REM method outperforms the autoregression model without the REM method for both datasets. Gradient Boost (GB) classifier outperforms other classifiers with a mean accuracy score of 98.00%, and 99.00% for imbalanced PMData and MOX2-5 datasets, respectively, and 98.30%, and 99.80% for balanced PMData and MOX2-5 datasets, respectively. Hermit reasoner performs better than other ontology reasoners under defined settings. Our proposed algorithm shows a direction to combine the AI prediction forecasting results in an ontology to generate personalized activity recommendations in eCoaching.

conclusionThe proposed method combining step-prediction, activity-level classification techniques, and personal preference information with semantic rules is an asset for generating personalized recommendations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHeuristicsAlgorithmsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalSemanticsAutoregressioneCoachEnsembleInterval predictionOntologyPersonalized recommendationPhysical activityResidual error minimizationTime-series

Identifiers

PMID38041041
PMCPMC10693173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.