Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38041014›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Comparison of intrathecal low-dose bupivacaine and morphine with intravenous patient control analgesia for postoperative analgesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Miao Guo, Suhong Tang, Yixin Wang, Fengxia Liu, Lin Wang, Dawei Yang, Jianyou Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miao GuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225000, China.
Suhong TangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225000, China.
Yixin WangGraduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, China.
Fengxia LiuGraduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, China.
Lin WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225000, China.
Dawei YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225000, China.
Jianyou ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225000, China. zhangjianyou@yzu.edu.cn.
Yangzhou University · CNDalian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThoracoscopic surgical techniques continue to advance, yet the intensity of postoperative pain remains significant, impeding swift patient recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in postoperative pain and recuperation between patients receiving intrathecal morphine paired with low-dose bupivacaine and those administered general anesthesia exclusively.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial enrolled 100 patients, who were allocated into three groups: Group M (5 μg/kg morphine intrathecal injection), Group B (5 μg/kg morphine combined with bupivacaine 3 mg intrathecal injection) and Group C (intrathecal sham injection). The primary outcome was the assessment of pain relief using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Additionally, intraoperative remifentanil consumption was quantified at the end of the surgery, and postoperative opioid use was determined by the number of patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA) compressions at 48 h post-surgery. Both the efficacy of the treatments and any complications were meticulously recorded.

resultsPostoperative NRS scores for both rest and exercise at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h were significantly lower in groups M and B than in group C (P<0.05). The intraoperative remifentanil dosage was significantly greater in groups M and C than in group B (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between groups M and C (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative propofol dosage across all three groups (P>0.05). Postoperative dosages of both sufentanil and Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were significantly less in groups M and B compared to group C (P<0.05). The time of first analgesic request was later in both groups M and B than in group C (P<0.05). Specific and total scores were elevated at 2 days postoperative when compared to scores at 1 day for all groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, at 1 day and 2 days postoperatively, both specific scores and total scores were higher in groups M and B compared to group C (P<0.05).

conclusionIntrathecal administration of morphine combined with bupivacaine has been shown to effectively ameliorate acute pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.

trial registrationThe trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: ChiCTR2200058544, registered 10/04/2022.

Indexed as

BupivacaineMorphineAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalHumansInjections, SpinalPostoperative PainRemifentanilThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineMorphineRemifentanilIntrathecal morphinePneumonectomyPostoperative painQuality of recoveryThoracoscopy lobectomy

Identifiers

PMID38041014
PMCPMC10691143
OpenAlexW4389227003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.