ArticleNeurosurgical review2023
The role of sphenoid bone in basilar invagination pathophysiology.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The significant differences between types 1 and 2 basilar invagination - a case- control study based on the sphenoid bone.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Basilar invagination (BI) is characterized by rostral dislocation of the cervical spine toward the skull base. The craniometrics of the skull base have shown significant differences among craniocervical junction malformations. The sphenoid bone is the center of the skull base; however, no study has evaluated this bone in cases of BI. This was a cross-sectional study of MRI databanks from two institutions of the author's practice between 1985 and 2020. The craniometrics of the sphenoid bone were measured in BI patients and controls. Fifty-eight MRIs were selected, including 28 BI patients and 30 controls. The mean sphenoid crest-clivus length was 32.66 ± 4.7 mm in the BI group and 29.98 ± 3.0 mm in the control group (p = 0.01). The mean sphenoid planum-top of Dorsum sellae length was 28.53 ± 3.7 mm in the BI group and 26.45 ± 3.2 mm in the control group (p = 0.02). The mean tuberculum sellae-sphenoid floor height was 18.52 ± 4.4 mm in the BI group and 21.32 ± 2.9 mm in the control group (p = 0.00). The mean sella turcica-sphenoid floor height was 10.35 ± 3.8 mm in the BI group and 12.24 ± 3.5 mm in the control group (p = 0.05). The mean clivus length was 29.81 ± 6.3 mm in the BI group and 40.86 ± 4.2 mm in the control group (p = 0.00). The mean sphenoid length was 58.34 ± 7.4 mm in the BI group and 67.31 ± 6.0 mm in the control group (p = 0.00). The mean sphenoid angle was 116.33 ± 8.7° in the BI group and 112.36 ± 6.9° in the control group (p = 0.05). The BI sphenoid bone has shorter vertical dimensions and longer horizontal measures. This morphology promotes a flattening of the sphenoid angle. The sphenoid bone is significantly altered in BI, favoring the congenital hypothesis in the pathophysiology of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.