ArticleNeuroradiology2024
Progressive white matter degeneration in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 2.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinformatic Analyses of the Ataxin-2 Family Since Algae Emphasize Its Small Isoforms, Large Chimerisms, and the Importance of Human Exon 1B as Target of Therapies to Prevent Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Assessment of Brainstem Volume Changes in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2): A Study on Patients and Preclinical Subjects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Pattern and Stages of Atrophy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: Volumetrics from ENIGMA-Ataxia.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
- Peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity: a novel biomarker for white matter damage in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- The Pattern and Staging of Brain Atrophy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2): MRI Volumetrics from ENIGMA-Ataxia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSpinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cerebellar atrophy. However, studies to elucidate the longitudinal progression of the neuropathology are limited. We sought to identify brain macrostructural and microstructural alterations in patients with SCA2 using fixel-based analysis (FBA) to better understand its distribution patterns and progression.
methodsWe enrolled 9 patients with SCA2 and 16 age- and gender-matched controls. Longitudinal clinical and imaging data were collected at baseline, and 3.5 years later. Fiber density (FD), fiber-bundle cross-section (FC), and a combination of FD and FC (FDC) were calculated. The paired t-test was used to examine longitudinal differences. The associations between fixel-based metrics and clinical variables were explored in SCA2 patients.
resultsAt baseline, patients with SCA2 displayed multiple white matter tracts with significantly decreased FD, FC, and FDC in the corticospinal tract, cerebellar peduncles, brainstem, corpus callosum, thalamus, striatum, and prefrontal cortex, compared to controls. Over time, many of these macrostructural and microstructural alterations progressed, manifesting lower FD, FC, and FDC in corticospinal tract, middle cerebellar peduncle, brainstem, striatum, fornix, and cingulum. No significant brain white matter alterations were found in the healthy controls over time. There was no association between the FBA-derived metrics and clinical variables in SCA2.
conclusionThis study provides evidence of brain macrostructural and microstructural alterations and of progression over time in SCA2. The FBA-derived metrics may serve as potential biomarkers of SCA2 progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.