Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38040702›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2023

Determining hemodilution in diagnostic bone marrow aspirated samples in plasma cell disorders by next-generation flow cytometry: Proposal for a bone marrow quality index.

Jón Þórir Óskarsson, Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson, Sigrun Thorsteinsdottir, Thor Aspelund, Steinar Bragi Gunnarsson, Guðlaug Katrín Hákonardóttir, Guðrún Ásta Sigurðardóttir, Ásdís Rósa Þórðardóttir, Gauti Kjartan Gíslason, Andri Ólafsson and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measurable Residual Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Jón Þórir ÓskarssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland. jto@hi.is.ORCID 0000-0002-9201-1166
Sæmundur RögnvaldssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0003-2162-8414
Sigrun ThorsteinsdottirFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-3530
Thor AspelundPublic Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Steinar Bragi GunnarssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Guðlaug Katrín HákonardóttirFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Guðrún Ásta SigurðardóttirFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Ásdís Rósa ÞórðardóttirFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Gauti Kjartan GíslasonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0003-4710-0781
Andri ÓlafssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Jón Kristinn SigurðssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Elías EyþórssonLandspítali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Ásbjörn JónssonAkureyri Hospital, Akureyri, Iceland.
Brynjar ViðarssonLandspítali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Páll Torfi ÖnundarsonLandspítali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Bjarni A AgnarssonLandspítali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Róbert PálmasonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Margrét SigurðardóttirLandspítali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Ingunn ÞorsteinsdóttirLandspítali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Ísleifur ÓlafssonLandspítali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Stephen HardingThe Binding Site Inc., Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Juan Flores-MonteroCancer Research Center (IBMCC, USAL-CSIC), Department of Medicine and Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS), University of Salamanca; Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL) and CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1119-4387
Alberto OrfaoCancer Research Center (IBMCC, USAL-CSIC), Department of Medicine and Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS), University of Salamanca; Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL) and CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0007-7230
Brian G M DurieCedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Thorvardur Jon LoveFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Sigurdur Yngvi KristinssonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-4964-7476
Reykjavík University · ISUniversity of Iceland · ISUniversidad de Salamanca · ESAkureyri Hospital · ISCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemodilution of bone marrow (BM) aspirates is a limitation of multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in plasma cell disorders. There is a need for a validated approach for assessing sample quality and the distribution of non-plasma cell BM populations by MFC could provide a solution. We evaluated BM-associated cell populations, assessed by next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) and white blood cell (WBC) count in 351 BM aspirated samples from 219 participants with plasma cell disorders in the Iceland Screens, Treats, or Prevents MM study (iStopMM), as markers of hemodilution by their discriminatory ability between first and (generally more hemodiluted) second pull BM aspirated samples. The most discriminating markers were used to derive a novel BM quality index (BMQI). Nucleated red blood cells and myeloid precursors provided the greatest discriminatory ability between first vs second pull samples (area under the curve (AUC): 0.87 and 0.85, respectively), significantly better than B cell precursors (AUC = 0.64; p < 0.001), mast cells (AUC = 0.65; p < 0.001), and the BM WBC count (AUC = 0.77; p < 0.05). We generated a novel BMQI that is intrinsic to current NGF protocols, for evaluating quality of diagnostic BM samples and suggest the use of a BMQI scoring system for interpreting results and guiding appropriate actions.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowParaproteinemiasBone Marrow CellsFlow CytometryHemodilutionHumansPlasma Cells

Identifiers

PMID38040702
PMCPMC10692231
OpenAlexW4389240081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.