Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38040691›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2023

AURKAIP1 actuates tumor progression through stabilizing DDX5 in triple negative breast cancer.

Wenwen Tian, Yuhui Tang, Yongzhou Luo, Jindong Xie, Shaoquan Zheng, Yutian Zou, Xiaojia Huang, Linyu Wu, Junsheng Zhang, Yuying Sun and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenwen Tian *Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2701-5993
Yuhui Tang *Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Yongzhou Luo *Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Jindong XieSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Shaoquan ZhengBreast Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1912-0216
Yutian ZouSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5205-9923
Xiaojia HuangAffiliated Cancer Hosipital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, No.78 Hengzhigang Road, Guangzhou, 510095, China.
Linyu WuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Junsheng ZhangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Yuying SunSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5789-256X
Hailin TangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3206-782X
Wei DuDepartment of pathology, The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, Hunan, China. dw417@sina.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5737-923X
Xing LiSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China. lixing@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5922-8689
Xiaoming XieSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China. xiexm@sysucc.org.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNThe First People's Hospital of Changde · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82173366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aurora-A kinase interacting protein 1 (AURKAIP1) has been proved to take an intermediary role in cancer by functioning as a negative regulator of Aurora-A kinase. However, it remains unclear whether and how AURKAIP1 itself would directly engage in regulating malignancies. The expression levels of AURKAIP1 were detected in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) by immunohistochemistry and western blots. The CCK8, colony formation assays and nude mouse model were conducted to determine cell proliferation whereas transwell and wound healing assays were performed to observe cell migration. The interaction of AURKAIP1 and DEAD-box helicase 5 (DDX5) were verified through co-immunoprecipitation and successively western blots. From the results, we found that AURKAIP1 was explicitly upregulated in TNBC, which was positively associated with tumor size, lymph node metastases, pathological stage and unfavorable prognosis. AURKAIP1 silencing markedly inhibited TNBC cell proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo. AURKAIP1 directly interacted with and stabilized DDX5 protein by preventing ubiquitination and degradation, and DDX5 overexpression successfully reversed proliferation inhibition induced by knockdown of AURKAIP1. Consequently, AURKAIP1 silencing suppressed the activity of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in a DDX5-dependent manner. Our study may primarily disclose the molecular mechanism by which AURKAIP1/DDX5/β-catenin axis modulated TNBC progression, indicating that AURKAIP1 might serve as a therapeutic target as well as a TNBC-specific biomarker for prognosis.

Indexed as

Aurora Kinase ATriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsbeta CateninCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationDEAD-box RNA HelicasesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMiceWnt Signaling Pathwayaryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting proteinAurora Kinase Abeta CateninDdx5 protein, humanDEAD-box RNA HelicasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

Identifiers

PMID38040691
PMCPMC10692340
OpenAlexW4389222460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.