Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38040428›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Validating a framework to guide the implementation of high-quality virtual primary care: an international eDelphi study protocol.

Joana Miguel Carvalho, Edmond Li, Benedict Hayhoe, Thomas Beaney, Azeem Majeed, Geva Greenfield, Ana Luísa Neves

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joana Miguel CarvalhoDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Edmond LiInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK edmond.li19@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8209-4490
Benedict HayhoeDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Thomas BeaneyDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9709-7264
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2357-9858
Geva GreenfieldDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ana Luísa NevesDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7107-7211
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an urgent need to support primary care organisations in implementing safe and high-quality virtual consultations. We have previously performed qualitative research to capture the views of 1600 primary care physicians across 20 countries on the main benefits and challenges of using virtual consultations. Subsequently, a prototype of a framework to guide the implementation of high-quality virtual primary care was developed.

aimTo explore general practitioners' perspectives on the appropriateness and relevance of each component of the framework's prototype, to further refine it and optimise its practical use in primary care facilities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants will be primary care physicians with active experience providing virtual care, recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. This study will use a systematic and iterative online Delphi research approach (eDelphi), with a minimum of three rounds. A pre-round will be used to circulate items for initial feedback and adjustment. In subsequent rounds, participants will be asked to rate the relevance of the framework's components. Consensus will be defined as >70% of participants agreeing/strongly agreeing or disagreeing/strongly disagreeing with a component. Data will be collected using structured online questionnaires. The primary outcome of the study will be a list of the essential components to be incorporated in the final version of the framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval conceded by the Imperial College London Science, Engineering and Technology Research Ethics Committee (SETREC) (reference no .6559176/2023). Anonymous results will be made available to the public, academic organisations and policymakers.

Indexed as

General PractitionersConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansLondonPrimary Health Carehealth informaticsinformation technologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38040428
PMCPMC10693863
OpenAlexW4389219332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.