Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38040423›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Sikh and Muslim perspectives on kidney transplantation: phase 1 of the DiGiT project - a qualitative descriptive study.

Sarah Brand, Sunil Daga, Kirit Mistry, Mohamed Morsy, Atul Bagul, Rizwan Hamer, Shafi Malik

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04327167 (Digital Intervention for Ethnic Groups in Transplantation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04327167 naunknown statusnot on this map

Digital Intervention for Ethnic Groups in Transplantation (DIGIT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustRan2019 to 2021Enrolled90ConditionsLive Donors, Ethnic Minorities, TransplantationArmsVideo and questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Brand *Department of Nephrology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Sunil DagaDepartment of Nephrology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Kirit MistrySouth Asian Health Action Charity, Leicester, UK.
Mohamed MorsyDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Atul BagulDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Rizwan HamerDepartment of Renal Transplantation and Nephrology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Shafi Malik *Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK dr_shafi@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4400-4129
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesKidney transplantation offers patients better quality of life and survival compared with dialysis. The risk of end stage renal disease is higher among ethnic minorities and they experience longer wait times on transplant lists. This inequality stems from a high need for kidney transplantation combined with a low rate of deceased donation among ethnic minority groups. This study aimed to explore the perspectives around living donor kidney transplantation of members of the Sikh and Muslim communities with an aim to develop a digital intervention to overcome any barriers.

designA qualitative descriptive study using in person focus groups.

settingUniversity Teaching Hospital and Transplant Centre.

participantsConvenience sampling of participants from the transplant population. Three focus groups were held with 20 participants, all were of South Asian ethnicity belonging to the Sikh and Muslim communities.

methodsInterviews were digitally audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim; transcripts were analysed thematically.

resultsFour themes were identified: (a) religious issues; (b) lack of knowledge within the community; (c) time; (d) cultural identification with transplantation.

conclusionsNot only is the information given and when it is delivered important, but also the person giving the information is crucial to enhance consideration of live donor kidney transplantation. Information should be in a first language where possible and overtly align to religious considerations. A more integrated approach to transplantation counselling should be adopted which includes healthcare professionals and credible members of the target cultural group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04327167.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationEthnicityHumansIslamMinority GroupsQuality of LifeRenal Dialysisadult nephrologychronic renal failuredialysisend stage renal failureethics (see medical ethics)renal transplantation

Identifiers

PMID38040423
PMCPMC10693862
OpenAlexW4389219375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.