ArticleNeuropsychologia2024
APOE ε4 positivity predicts centrality of episodic memory nodes in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A cohort-based, graph theory-informed study of cognitive networks.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of Alzheimer's biomarker positivity on neuropsychological networks.Brain communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As network neuroscience can capture the systemic impact of APOE variability at a neuroimaging level, this study investigated the network-based cognitive endophenotypes of ε4-carriers and non-carriers across the continuum between normal ageing and Alzheimer's dementia (AD). We hypothesised that the impact of APOE-ε4 on cognitive functioning can be reliably captured by the measurement of graph-theory centrality. Cognitive networks were calculated in 8118 controls, 3482 MCI patients and 4573 AD patients, recruited in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database. Nodal centrality was selected as the neurofunctional readout of interest. ε4-carrier-vs.-non-carrier differences were tested in two independent NACC sub-cohorts assessed with either Version 1 or Version 2 of the Uniform Data Set neuropsychological battery. A significant APOE-dependent effect emerged from the analysis of the Logical-Memory nodes in MCI patients in both sub-cohorts. While non-carriers showed equal centrality in immediate and delayed recall, the latter was significantly less central among carriers (v1: bootstrapped confidence interval 0.107-0.667, p < 0.001; v2: bootstrapped confidence interval 0.018-0.432, p < 0.001). This indicates that, in carriers, delayed recall was, overall, significantly more weakly correlated with the other cognitive scores. These findings were replicated in the sub-groups of sole amnestic-MCI patients (n = 2971), were independent of differences in network communities, clinical severity or other demographic factors. No effects were found in the other two diagnostic groups. APOE-ε4 influences nodal properties of cognitive networks when patients are clinically classified as MCI. This highlights the importance of characterising the impact of risk factors on the wider cognitive network via network-neuroscience methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.