Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38039992›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2023

Stereotactic body radiotherapy with or without selective dismutase mimetic in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an adaptive, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2 trial.

Cullen M Taniguchi, Jessica M Frakes, Todd A Aguilera, Manisha Palta, Brian Czito, Manoop S Bhutani, Lauren E Colbert, Joseph Abi Jaoude, Vincent Bernard, Shubham Pant and 21 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03340974 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

An Adaptive Phase I/II Dose Escalation Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Combination With Radiomodulating Agent GC4419 in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorGalera Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2018 to 2021Enrolled42ConditionsPancreatic Cancer, Stereotactic Body Radiation TherapyArmsGC4419, Placebo, Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (SBRT) 50 Gy, Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (SBRT) 55 Gy
NCT04698915 phase2terminatednot on this map

GRECO-2: A Randomized, Phase 2b Study of GC4711 in Combination With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in the Treatment of Unresectable or Borderline Resectable Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorGalera Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled177ConditionsSBRT, Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer, Unresectable Pancreatic CancerArmsDrug GC4711, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Cullen M TaniguchiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jessica M FrakesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Todd A AguileraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Manisha PaltaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Brian CzitoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Manoop S BhutaniDepartment of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Lauren E ColbertDepartment of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Joseph Abi JaoudeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Vincent BernardDepartment of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Shubham PantDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ching-Wei D TzengDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Dae Won KimDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Mokenge MalafaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
James CostelloDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Geena MathewDepartment of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Neal RebuenoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Eugene J KoayDepartment of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Prajnan DasDepartment of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ethan B LudmirDepartment of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Matthew H G KatzDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert A WolffDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sam BeddarDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Gabriel O SawakuchiDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Shalini MoningiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rebecca S Slack TidwellDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ying YuanDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Peter F ThallDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert A BeardsleyGalera Therapeutics, Malvern, PA, USA.
Jon HolmlundGalera Therapeutics, Malvern, PA, USA.
Joseph M HermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lake Success, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Sarah E HoffeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. Electronic address: Sarah.Hoffe@moffitt.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USDuke Cancer InstituteDuke Medical Center · USHofstra University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has the potential to ablate localised pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Selective dismutase mimetics sensitise tumours while reducing normal tissue toxicity. This trial was designed to establish the efficacy and toxicity afforded by the selective dismutase mimetic avasopasem manganese when combined with ablative SBRT for localised pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

methodsIn this adaptive, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2 trial, patients aged 18 years or older with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer who had received at least 3 months of chemotherapy and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were enrolled at six academic sites in the USA. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), with block randomisation (block sizes of 6-12) with a maximum of 24 patients per group, to receive daily avasopasem (90 mg) or placebo intravenously directly before (ie, within 180 min) SBRT (50, 55, or 60 Gy in five fractions, adaptively assigned in real time by Bayesian estimates of 90-day safety and efficacy). Patients and physicians were masked to treatment group allocation, but not to SBRT dose. The primary objective was to find the optimal dose of SBRT with avasopasem or placebo as determined by the late onset EffTox method. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03340974, and is complete.

findingsBetween Jan 25, 2018, and April 29, 2020, 47 patients were screened, of whom 42 were enrolled (median age was 71 years [IQR 63-75], 23 [55%] were male, 19 [45%] were female, 37 [88%] were White, three [7%] were Black, and one [2%] each were unknown or other races) and randomly assigned to avasopasem (n=24) or placebo (n=18); the placebo group was terminated early after failing to meet prespecified efficacy parameters. At data cutoff (June 28, 2021), the avasopasem group satisfied boundaries for both efficacy and toxicity. Late onset EffTox efficacy response was observed in 16 (89%) of 18 patients at 50 Gy and six (100%) of six patients at 55 Gy in the avasopasem group, and was observed in three (50%) of six patients at 50 Gy and nine (75%) of 12 patients at 55 Gy in the placebo group, and the Bayesian model recommended 50 Gy or 55 Gy in five fractions with avasopasem for further study. Serious adverse events of any cause were reported in three (17%) of 18 patients in the placebo group and six (25%) of 24 in the avasopasem group. In the placebo group, grade 3 adverse events within 90 days of SBRT were abdominal pain, acute cholangitis, pyrexia, increased blood lactic acid, and increased lipase (one [6%] each); no grade 4 events occurred. In the avasopasem group, grade 3-4 adverse events within 90 days of SBRT were acute kidney injury, increased blood alkaline phosphatase, haematoma, colitis, gastric obstruction, lung infection, abdominal abscess, post-surgical atrial fibrillation, and pneumonia leading to respiratory failure (one [4%] each).There were no treatment-related deaths but one late death in the avasopasem group due to sepsis in the setting of duodenal obstruction after off-study treatment was reported as potentially related to SBRT.

interpretationSBRT that uses 50 or 55 Gy in five fractions can be considered for patients with localised pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The addition of avasopasem might further enhance disease outcomes. A larger phase 2 trial (GRECO-2, NCT04698915) is underway to validate these results.

fundingGalera Therapeutics.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBayes TheoremDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID38039992
PMCPMC11955909
OpenAlexW4389074122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.