Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38039538›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical focus2023

An institutional experience in applying quality improvement measures to pituitary surgery: clinical and resource implications.

Panayiotis E Pelargos, Aamr Hasanjee, Benjamin Lee, Audrey Grossen, Kiana Y Prather, Xiaochun Zhao, Prince Ohene-Nyako, Matthew P Baier, Amanda Kate McDaniel, Kibwei A McKinney and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical focus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Panayiotis E PelargosDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Aamr Hasanjee2Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Benjamin LeeDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Audrey GrossenDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Kiana Y PratherDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Xiaochun ZhaoDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Prince Ohene-Nyako2Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Matthew P BaierDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Amanda Kate McDanielDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Kibwei A McKinney2Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Christopher S GraffeoDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Edward El Rassi2Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Ian F DunnDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
University of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USOklahoma City University · US

Funding

GEROSCIENCE TRAINING PROGRAM IN OKLAHOMAT32AG052363 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Benjamin Francis Miller, William Edmund Sonntag · 2017 to 2026
$3.6M
BLRD VA I01 BX005592NIA NIH HHS T32 AG052363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to report the authors' experience developing a Lean Six Sigma clinical care pathway (CCP) for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal operations.

methodsUsing Lean Six Sigma quality improvement principles-including the define, measure, analyze, improve, and control framework-the authors developed a CCP for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal operations, incorporating preoperative, intraoperative, and inpatient and outpatient postoperative phases of care. Efficacy and quality metrics were defined as postoperative length of stay (LOS), presentation to the emergency department (ED) or readmission within 30 days of discharge, and hospital charges. The study included all adult patients who underwent elective endoscopic endonasal resection for pituitary adenoma, Rathke's cleft cyst, craniopharyngioma, pituicytoma, or arachnoid cyst during the sampling period (April 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022).

resultsTwo hundred twenty-eight patients met criteria and were included; 94 were treated before and 134 were treated after implementation of the CCP. Differences between groups in age, gender, race, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, geographic distribution, preoperative serum sodium, tumor size, adenoma functional status, and prior surgery were not significant. The mean postoperative LOS significantly decreased from 4.5 to 1.7 days following CCP implementation (p < 0.0001); LOS variability also decreased, with the standard deviation declining from 3.1 to 1.5 days. The proportion of patients discharged on postoperative day (POD) 1 significantly increased from 0% to 61.9% (p < 0.0001). Fewer than one-quarter of the patients (23.4%) were discharged by POD 2 prior to the CCP, while 88.8% of were discharged by POD 2 after CCP implementation (p < 0.0001). Rates of 30-day ED presentations or readmissions were not significantly different (2.1% vs 6.0%, p = 0.20, and 7.5% vs 6.7%, p > 0.99, respectively). Mean per-patient hospital costs declined from $38,326 to $26,289 (p < 0.0001), with an associated change in cost variability from a standard deviation of $16,716 to $12,498.

conclusionsCCP implementation significantly improved LOS and costs of endoscopic endonasal resection, without adversely impacting postoperative ED presentations or readmissions.

Indexed as

AdenomaCraniopharyngiomaPituitary NeoplasmsAdultEndoscopyHumansNosePituitary GlandPostoperative ComplicationsQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeclinical care pathwayendoscopic endonasal approachenhanced recovery after surgeryERASpituitary adenomaQIquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID38039538
PMCPMC10798057
OpenAlexW4389279341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.