Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38039096›Full record

ReviewClinical chemistry2024

Clinical Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Oral Fluids Following Infection and Vaccination.

Christopher D Heaney, Heidi Hempel, Kate L DeRosa, Ligia A Pinto, Nicholas J Mantis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher D HeaneyDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Heidi HempelVaccine, Immunity and Cancer Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, United States.
Kate L DeRosaDivision of Infectious Diseases, NewYork State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0280-2667
Ligia A PintoVaccine, Immunity and Cancer Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, United States.
Nicholas J MantisDivision of Infectious Diseases, NewYork State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-8640
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USNew York State Department of Health · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

WORK ORDER 126643 B539 EXPAND IC SUITE75N91019D00024 · NIAID · LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. · PI BRISCOE, LYNN · 2019 to 2025
$3932.6M
High-Throughput Dried Blood Spot (HT-DBS) Technologies in SARS COV-2 Serology and VaccinologyU01CA260508 · NCI · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI MANTIS, NICHOLAS J. · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS 75N91019D00024NCI NIH HHS U01 CA260508NCI NIH HHS U01CA260508NIH HHS 75N91019D00024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSARS-CoV-2 variants continue to circulate globally, even within highly vaccinated populations. The first-generation SARS-CoV-2 vaccines elicit neutralizing immunoglobin G (IgG) antibodies that prevent severe COVID-19 but induce only weak antibody responses in mucosal tissues. There is increasing recognition that secretory immunoglobin A (SIgA) antibodies in the upper respiratory tract and oral cavity are critical in interrupting virus shedding, transmission, and progression of disease. To fully understand the immune-related factors that influence SARS-CoV-2 dynamics at the population level, it will be necessary to monitor virus-specific IgG and SIgA in systemic and mucosal compartments. CONTENT: Oral fluids and saliva, with appropriate standardized collection methods, constitute a readily accessible biospecimen type from which both systemic and mucosal antibodies can be measured. Serum-derived IgG and immunoglobin A (IgA) are found in gingival crevicular fluids and saliva as the result of transudation, while SIgA, which is produced in response to mucosal infection and vaccination, is actively transported across salivary gland epithelia and present in saliva and passive drool. In this mini-review, we summarize the need for the implementation of standards, highly qualified reagents, and best practices to ensure that clinical science is both rigorous and comparable across laboratories and institutions. We discuss the need for a better understanding of sample stability, collection methods, and other factors that affect measurement outcomes and interlaboratory variability. SUMMARY: The establishment of best practices and clinical laboratory standards for the assessment of SARS-CoV-2 serum and mucosal antibodies in oral fluids is integral to understanding immune-related factors that influence COVID-19 transmission and persistence within populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin A, SecretoryImmunoglobulin GSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin A, SecretoryImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID38039096
PMCPMC10987228
OpenAlexW4389220084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.