Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38039074›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

A Stable and Scalable Digital Composite Neurocognitive Test for Early Dementia Screening Based on Machine Learning: Model Development and Validation Study.

Dongmei Gu, Xiaozhen Lv, Chuan Shi, Tianhong Zhang, Sha Liu, Zili Fan, Lihui Tu, Ming Zhang, Nan Zhang, Liming Chen and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Information about elective egg freezing on instagram reels: a content review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Dongmei GuClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9752-3881
Xiaozhen LvClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0934-3168
Chuan ShiClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2627-1189
Tianhong ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5379-7119
Sha LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6710-8126
Zili FanClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1041-8569
Lihui TuClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1136-8006
Ming ZhangClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8921-095X
Nan ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9675-5322
Liming ChenChina Telecom Digital Intelligence Technology Co.,Ltd, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0003-1159-5409
Zhijiang WangClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4045-419X
Jing WangClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6301-6817
Ying ZhangClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4938-6536
Huizi LiClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8282-4964
Luchun WangClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4640-1577
Jiahui ZhuClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0003-2157-8768
Yaonan ZhengClinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0312-9857
Huali Wang *Clinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-6493
Xin Yu *Clinical Research Division, Dementia Care and Research Center, Peking University Institute of Mental Health (Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3983-4937
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)see Acknowledgements, .
Peking University · CNCapital Medical University · CNChina Telecom (China) · CNKnowledge Centre for Agriculture · DKShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanxi Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNTianjin Medical University General Hospital · CN

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia has become a major public health concern due to its heavy disease burden. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage between healthy aging and dementia. Early identification of MCI is an essential step in dementia prevention.

objectiveBased on machine learning (ML) methods, this study aimed to develop and validate a stable and scalable panel of cognitive tests for the early detection of MCI and dementia based on the Chinese Neuropsychological Consensus Battery (CNCB) in the Chinese Neuropsychological Normative Project (CN-NORM) cohort.

methodsCN-NORM was a nationwide, multicenter study conducted in China with 871 participants, including an MCI group (n=327, 37.5%), a dementia group (n=186, 21.4%), and a cognitively normal (CN) group (n=358, 41.1%). We used the following 4 algorithms to select candidate variables: the F-score according to the SelectKBest method, the area under the curve (AUC) from logistic regression (LR), P values from the logit method, and backward stepwise elimination. Different models were constructed after considering the administration duration and complexity of combinations of various tests. Receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC metrics were used to evaluate the discriminative ability of the models via stratified sampling cross-validation and LR and support vector classification (SVC) algorithms. This model was further validated in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative phase 3 (ADNI-3) cohort (N=743), which included 416 (56%) CN subjects, 237 (31.9%) patients with MCI, and 90 (12.1%) patients with dementia.

resultsExcept for social cognition, all other domains in the CNCB differed between the MCI and CN groups (P<.008). In feature selection results regarding discrimination between the MCI and CN groups, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-5 minutes Recall had the best performance, with the highest mean AUC of up to 0.80 (SD 0.02) and an F-score of up to 258.70. The scalability of model 5 (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-5 minutes Recall and Trail Making Test-B) was the lowest. Model 5 achieved a higher level of discrimination than the Hong Kong Brief Cognitive test score in distinguishing between the MCI and CN groups (P<.05). Model 5 also provided the highest sensitivity of up to 0.82 (range 0.72-0.92) and 0.83 (range 0.75-0.91) according to LR and SVC, respectively. This model yielded a similar robust discriminative performance in the ADNI-3 cohort regarding differentiation between the MCI and CN groups, with a mean AUC of up to 0.81 (SD 0) according to both LR and SVC algorithms.

conclusionsWe developed a stable and scalable composite neurocognitive test based on ML that could differentiate not only between patients with MCI and controls but also between patients with different stages of cognitive impairment. This composite neurocognitive test is a feasible and practical digital biomarker that can potentially be used in large-scale cognitive screening and intervention studies.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionHumansMachine LearningMental Status and Dementia TestsNeuropsychological Testscognitive screeningdementiadigital cognitive assessmentmachine learningmild cognitive impairmentneurocognitive test

Identifiers

PMID38039074
PMCPMC10724812
OpenAlexW4389244906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.