ArticleJAMA network open2023
National Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Use of Recommended Therapies in Adults with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, 1999-2020.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic impact of guideline-directed medical therapy after functionally complete revascularisation in patients with obstructive coronary artery diseases.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2026Trial
- Polygenic Prediction of Nongoal Response to Statin Therapy.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term trends of lipid concentrations and lipid control in South Korea, 2007 to 2023: A nationwide representative study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Powered Wearable and Portable Devices for Remote Cardiac Care and Population Health.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Measuring patient adherence in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-enhanced Electrocardiography for Heart Failure Screening and Risk Stratification.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Does Left Atrial Size and E/e' Predict Outcomes in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy?Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Social Determinants of Health Correlates and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Adults in Baltimore: The EngAGE With Heart Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Trends and Disparities in Stroke Mortality Among Adults with Hyperlipidemia in the United States, 1999-2023.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025Article
- Echoes of Inequity: A Critical Examination of the Past, Present, and Future of Cardiac Health Equity.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Coronary Artery Disease Prevalence in an Executive Population at a Tertiary Medical Center: Protocol for a Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Advancement of the implementation of evidence-based therapies for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic conditions: A multi-stakeholder perspective.American heart journal · 2025Review
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Patient and Cardiologist Perspectives on the Treatment of Patients With Concomitant ASCVD and Obesity.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- Sex, ethnicity and language differences in statin prescribing in community health center patients.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
- Digital health innovation and artificial intelligence in cardiovascular care: a case-based review.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2024Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Is it Ready for Prime Time?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Despite efforts to improve the quality of care for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), it is unclear whether the US has made progress in reducing racial and ethnic differences in utilization of guideline-recommended therapies for secondary prevention. Objective: To evaluate 21-year trends in racial and ethnic differences in utilization of guideline-recommended pharmacological medications and lifestyle modifications among US adults with ASCVD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study includes data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 1999 and 2020. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years or older with a history of ASCVD. Data were analyzed between March 2022 and May 2023. Exposure: Self-reported race and ethnicity. Main Outcome and Measures: Rates and racial and ethnic differences in the use of guideline-recommended pharmacological medications and lifestyle modifications. Results: The study included 5218 adults with a history of ASCVD (mean [SD] age, 65.5 [13.2] years, 2148 women [weighted average, 44.2%]), among whom 1170 (11.6%) were Black, 930 (7.7%) were Hispanic or Latino, and 3118 (80.7%) were White in the weighted sample. Between 1999 and 2020, there was a significant increase in total cholesterol control and statin use in all racial and ethnic subgroups, and in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) utilization in non-Hispanic White individuals and Hispanic and Latino individuals (Hispanic and Latino individuals: 17.12 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.37-37.88 percentage points; P = .046; non-Hispanic White individuals: 12.14 percentage points; 95% CI, 6.08-18.20 percentage points; P < .001), as well as smoking cessation within the Hispanic and Latino population (-27.13 percentage points; 95% CI, -43.14 to -11.12 percentage points; P = .002). During the same period, the difference in smoking cessation between Hispanic and Latino individuals and White individuals was reduced (-24.85 percentage points; 95% CI, -38.19 to -11.51 percentage points; P < .001), but racial and ethnic differences for other metrics did not change significantly. Notably, substantial gaps persisted between current care and optimal care throughout the 2 decades of data analyzed. In the period of 2017 to 2020, optimal regimens were observed in 47.4% (95% CI, 39.3%-55.4%), 48.7% (95% CI, 36.7%-60.6%), and 53.0% (95% CI, 45.6%-60.4%) of Black, Hispanic and Latino, and White individuals, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US adults with ASCVD, significant disparities persisted between current care and optimal care, surpassing any differences observed among demographic groups. These findings highlight the critical need for sustained efforts to bridge these gaps and achieve better outcomes for all patients, regardless of their racial and ethnic backgrounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.