Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38038927›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Web-Based Resources to Investigate Protease Function.

Salvatore Santamaria

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Salvatore SantamariaDepartment of Biochemical Sciences, School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK. s.santamaria@surrey.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/IBSRF/20/25032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2001, the release of the first draft of the human genome marked the beginning of the Big Data era for biological sciences. Since then, the complexity of datasets generated by laboratories worldwide has increased exponentially. Public repositories such as the Protein Data Bank, which has exceeded the 200000 entries in 2023, have been instrumental not only to collect, organize, and distill this enormous research output but also to promote further research enterprises. The achievements of artificial intelligence programs such as AlphaFold would not have been possible without the collective efforts of countless researchers who made their work publicly available. Here, I provide a practical, but far from exhaustive, list of resources useful to investigate protease function.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticPeptide HydrolasesArtificial IntelligenceGenome, HumanHumansInternetPeptide HydrolasesADAMTSCancerDatabaseMetalloproteaseProteases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.