ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2024
Trajectory of pulmonary congestion during TAVR.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Cardiogenic Shock.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Prognostic Utility of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Predictors of the diuretic response in acute decompensated heart failure patients with severe aortic stenosis: sub-analysis of the LOHAS registry.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with severe aortic stenosis often experience pulmonary congestion due to incremental afterload. The trajectory of pulmonary fluid volume during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains uncertain. Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) is a recently introduced device for non-invasive quantification of lung fluid volume without expert techniques. We evaluated the trajectory of ReDS values during TAVR and its prognostic implications. Patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent ReDS measurements upon admission and at the index discharge after TAVR between 2021 and 2022 were eligible. They were followed up until August 2023. The primary focus was on the trajectory of ReDS values during TAVR, with secondary consideration given to its impact on the composite of death or all-cause readmission after TAVR. A total of 57 patients were included. Median age was 84 years and 24 were male. ReDS value remained unchanged after TAVR, changing from 27% (IQR 24%, 29%) to 26% (IQR 24%, 30%) (p = 0.65). ReDS value did not decrease in 23 (40%) patients. The presence of coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were associated with no decrease in ReDS value. This lack of decrease in ReDS value was linked to death or all-cause readmission after TAVR, with an age-adjusted hazard ratio of 3.40 (95% confidence interval 1.01-11.4, p = 0.048). The degree of lung fluid amount did not decrease in 40% of TAVR candidates during the procedure. The lack of decrease in lung fluid amount was associated with mortality and morbidity after TAVR. The next concern is to establish therapeutic strategy for patients with residual pulmonary congestion after TAVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.