Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38038778›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2024

HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Care in Belgium: A mixed-methods Study on PrEP Users' Experiences and Service Delivery Preferences.

Anke Rotsaert, Jef Vanhamel, Thibaut Vanbaelen, Bea Vuylsteke, Maarten Schim van der Loeff, Bernadette Hensen, Karina Kielmann, Steven Callens, Thijs Reyniers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anke Rotsaert *Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp, B-2000, Belgium.
Jef Vanhamel *Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp, B-2000, Belgium. jvanhamel@itg.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-1876
Thibaut VanbaelenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bea VuylstekeDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp, B-2000, Belgium.
Maarten Schim van der LoeffDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bernadette HensenDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp, B-2000, Belgium.
Karina KielmannDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp, B-2000, Belgium.
Steven CallensDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Thijs ReyniersDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, Antwerp, B-2000, Belgium.
Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEGGD Amsterdam · NLGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek S004919N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Belgium, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) services are mainly provided through specialised HIV clinics. To optimise PrEP uptake and retention in care, we require insights into users' perspectives on PrEP care. We aimed to elicit experiences with, and preferences for, PrEP service delivery among PrEP users in Belgium, including willingness to involve their family physician (FP) in PrEP care. We adopted a sequential mixed-methods design. We used a web-based longitudinal study among 326 PrEP users that consisted of two questionnaires at six-month intervals, and complemented this with 21 semi-structured interviews (September 2020-January 2022). We conducted descriptive analyses and logistic regression to examine factors associated with willingness to involve their FP in PrEP care. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Survey respondents reported high satisfaction with care received in HIV clinics [median score 9 (IQR 8-10), 10='very satisfied']. Interviews revealed the importance of regular HIV/STI screening, and the expertise and stigma-free environment of HIV clinics. Yet, they also contextualised service delivery barriers reported in the questionnaire, including the burden of cost and challenges integrating PrEP visits into their private and professional lives. Although 63.8% (n = 208/326) of baseline respondents preferred attending an HIV clinic for PrEP follow-up, 51.9% (n = 108/208) of participants in the follow-up questionnaire reported to be willing to have their FP involved in PrEP care. Participants reporting trust in FPs' PrEP and sexual health expertise, or who didn't feel judged by their FP, were more likely to be willing to involve them in PrEP care. Therefore, we recommend a differentiated PrEP service delivery approach, including involving FPs, to make PrEP care more client-centred.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexually Transmitted DiseasesBelgiumHumansLongitudinal StudiesAnti-HIV AgentsDifferentiated Service DeliveryHIV PreventionMixed-methodsPre-exposure ProphylaxisPrEP

Identifiers

PMID38038778
OpenAlexW4389222279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.