Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38038370›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024

Low-pass sequencing plus imputation using avidity sequencing displays comparable imputation accuracy to sequencing by synthesis while reducing duplicates.

Jeremiah H Li, Karrah Findley, Joseph K Pickrell, Kelly Blease, Junhua Zhao, Semyon Kruglyak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sequencing and health data resource of children of African ancestry.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeremiah H LiGencove, NewYork, NY 11101USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9344-0237
Karrah FindleyGencove, NewYork, NY 11101USA.
Joseph K PickrellGencove, NewYork, NY 11101USA.
Kelly BleaseElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA 92121USA.
Junhua ZhaoElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA 92121USA.
Semyon KruglyakElement Biosciences, San Diego, CA 92121USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-pass sequencing with genotype imputation has been adopted as a cost-effective method for genotyping. The most widely used method of short-read sequencing uses sequencing by synthesis (SBS). Here we perform a study of a novel sequencing technology-avidity sequencing. In this short note, we compare the performance of imputation from low-pass libraries sequenced on an Element AVITI system (which utilizes avidity sequencing) to those sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (which utilizes SBS) with an SP flow cell for the same set of biological samples across a range of genetic ancestries. We observed dramatically lower optical duplication rates in the data deriving from the AVITI system compared to the NovaSeq 6000, resulting in higher effective coverage given a fixed number of sequenced bases, and comparable imputation accuracy performance between sequencing chemistries across ancestries. This study demonstrates that avidity sequencing is a viable alternative to the standard SBS chemistries for applications involving low-pass sequencing plus imputation.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenotypeavidity sequencingelement sequencinghaplotype reference panelsimputationlow-pass sequencingwhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38038370
PMCPMC10849336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.