ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2023
Using Noncovalent Interactions to Test the Precision of Projector-Augmented Wave Data Sets.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Level Coupled-Cluster Description of Crystal Lattice Energies.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The projector-augmented wave (PAW) method is one of the approaches that are widely used to approximately treat core electrons and thus to speed up plane-wave basis set electronic structure calculations. However, PAW involves approximations, and it is thus important to understand how they affect the results. Tests of the precision of PAW data sets often use the properties of isolated atoms or atomic solids. While this is sufficient to identify problematic PAW data sets, little information has been gained to understand the origins of the errors and suggest ways to correct them. Here, we show that the interaction energies of molecular dimers are very useful not only to identify problematic PAW data sets but also to uncover the origin of the errors. Using dimers from the S22 and S66 test sets and other dimers, we find that the error in the interaction energy is composed of a short-range component with an exponential decay and a long-range electrostatic part caused by an error in the total charge density. We propose and evaluate a simple improvable scheme to correct the long-range error and find that even in its simple and readily usable form, it is able to reduce the interaction energy errors to less than half on average for hydrogen-bonded dimers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.