Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38038262›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024

The COVID-19 pandemic and neurology: A survey on previous and continued restrictions for clinical practice, curricular training, and health economics.

Martin Rakusa, Elena Moro, Tamar Akhvlediani, Daniel Bereczki, Benedetta Bodini, Francesco Cavallieri, Alessandra Fanciulli, Saša R Filipović, Alla Guekht, Raimund Helbok and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Rome was not built in a day, nor is a resilient clinical autonomic care unit.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Is there still hesitancy towards SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among people with neurological disease- a survey of the NeuroCOVID-19 task force of the European Academy of Neurology.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. European Academy of Neurology: First 10 years.European journal of neurology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Martin RakusaDivision of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4433-3985
Elena MoroDivision of Neurology, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, INSERM U1216, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7968-5908
Tamar AkhvledianiNeolab Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Daniel BereczkiDepartment of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8374-0500
Benedetta BodiniNeurology Department, St. Antoine Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8010-1220
Francesco CavallieriNeurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Alessandra FanciulliDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2854-4179
Saša R FilipovićInstitute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Alla GuekhtResearch and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Raimund HelbokDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Sonja HochmeisterDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Filippo Martinelli BoneschiNeurology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-1368
Serefnur ÖzturkDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Alberto PrioriAldo Ravelli Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1549-3851
Michele RomoliNeurology and Stroke Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8009-8543
Barbara WillekensDepartment of Neurology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Marialuisa ZeddeNeurology Unit, Stroke Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Johann SellnerDepartment of Neurology, Landesklinkum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria.
NeuroCOVID-19 Task Force of the European Academy of Neurology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted health systems worldwide. Here, we assessed the pandemic's impact on clinical service, curricular training, and financial burden from a neurological viewpoint during the enforced lockdown periods and the assumed recovery by 2023.

methodsAn online 18-item survey was conducted by the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) NeuroCOVID-19 Task Force among the EAN community. The survey was online between February and March 2023. Questions related to general, demographic, clinical, work, education, and economic aspects.

resultsWe collected 430 responses from 79 countries. Most health care professionals were aged 35-44 years, with >15 years of work experience. The key findings of their observations were as follows. (i) Clinical services were cut back in all neurological subspecialties during the most restrictive COVID-19 lockdown period. The most affected neurological subspecialties were services for patients with dementia, and neuromuscular and movement disorders. The levels of reduction and the pace of recovery were distinct for acute emergencies and in- and outpatient care. Recovery was slow for sleep medicine, autonomic nervous system disorders, neurorehabilitation, and dementia care. (ii) Student and residency rotations and grand rounds were reorganized, and congresses were converted into a virtual format. Conferences are partly maintained in a hybrid format. (iii) Affordability of neurological care and medication shortage are emerging issues.

conclusionsRecovery of neurological services up to spring 2023 has been incomplete following substantial disruption of neurological care, medical education, and health economics in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The continued limitations for the delivery of neurological care threaten brain health and call for action on a global scale.

Indexed as

COVID-19DementiaNeurologyCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2brain healthCOVID-19curricular traininghealth economicslockdown periodneurological care

Identifiers

PMID38038262
PMCPMC11235678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.