Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38038193›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2024

Statistical inference with large-scale trait imputation.

Jingchen Ren, Wei Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingchen RenSchool of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Wei PanDivision of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1159-0582

Funding

Causal and integrative deep learning for Alzheimer's disease geneticsU01AG073079 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Deep Learning with Neuroimaging Genetic Data for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG069895 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Association analysis of rare variants with sequencing dataR01HL116720 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, WEI, PENG · 2013 to 2020
$3.3M
Discovering causal genes, brain regions and other risk factors for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG065636 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
Integrating Alzheimer's disease GWAS with proteomic and metabolomic QTL dataRF1AG067924 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2020 to 2020
$1.9M
Estimation and Inference of Gene Regulatory NetworksR01GM126002 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116720NIA NIH HHS R01 AG065636NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069895NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG067924NIA NIH HHS U01 AG073079NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126002NIH HHS R01 AG065636NIH HHS R01 AG069895NIH HHS R01 GM126002NIH HHS R01 HL116720NIH HHS RF1 AG067924NIH HHS U01 AG073079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently a nonparametric method called LS-imputation has been proposed for large-scale trait imputation based on a GWAS summary dataset and a large set of genotyped individuals. The imputed trait values, along with the genotypes, can be treated as an individual-level dataset for downstream genetic analyses, including those that cannot be done with GWAS summary data. However, since the covariance matrix of the imputed trait values is often too large to calculate, the current method imposes a working assumption that the imputed trait values are identically and independently distributed, which is incorrect in truth. Here we propose a "divide and conquer/combine" strategy to estimate and account for the covariance matrix of the imputed trait values via batches, thus relaxing the incorrect working assumption. Applications of the methods to the UK Biobank data for marginal association analysis showed some improvement by the new method in some cases, but overall the original method performed well, which was explained by nearly constant variances of and mostly weak correlations among imputed trait values.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenotypeHumansPhenotypeGWASleast squareslinear modelsLS-imputationSNP

Identifiers

PMID38038193
PMCPMC10848238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.