Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38038188›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2023

Agreement Between Guideline Thresholds Using an "All-in-One" Device to Measure Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressures.

Kazuomi Kario, Naoko Tomitani, Satoshi Hoshide, Masafumi Nishizawa, Tetsuro Yoshida, Tomoyuki Kabutoya, Takeshi Fujiwara, Hiroyuki Mizuno, HI‐JAMP Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Mean-ing Beyond Office Blood Pressure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazuomi KarioDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Jichi Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8251-4480
Naoko TomitaniDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Jichi Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1443-7073
Satoshi HoshideDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Jichi Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Masafumi NishizawaMinamisanriku Hospital Motoyoshi-gun Miyagi Japan.
Tetsuro YoshidaOnga Nakama Medical Association Onga Hospital Fukuoka Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6259-1403
Tomoyuki KabutoyaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Jichi Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5439-4303
Takeshi FujiwaraDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Jichi Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4151-2806
Hiroyuki MizunoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Jichi Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2266-0627
HI‐JAMP Study Group
Jichi Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood pressure (BP) thresholds for diagnosing and managing hypertension vary for office, home, and ambulatory readings, and between guideline documents. This analysis determined corresponding office, home, and ambulatory BP thresholds using baseline data from the HI-JAMP (Home-Activity Information and Communication Technology-Based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) study, which used a validated "all-in-one" BP monitoring device. METHODS AND

resultsData from 2322 treated patients with hypertension who underwent office BP measurement, then 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, then home BP monitoring for 5 days were analyzed. Corresponding BP thresholds for office, home, and ambulatory measurements were determined using Deming regression. Values equivalent to office systolic BP (SBP) of 120 and 140 mm Hg were as follows: 115.9 and 127.7 mm Hg for 24-hour ambulatory SBP; 120.8 and 134.0 mm Hg for daytime ambulatory SBP; 104.9 and 117.9 mm Hg for nighttime ambulatory SBP; and 122.0 and 134.2 mm Hg for morning-evening average home SBP. Deming regression showed that morning-evening average home SBP and daytime ambulatory SBP were almost the same (home SBP=0.99×daytime ambulatory SBP+0.27 mm Hg;

conclusionsAmbulatory and home BP thresholds in this analysis were similar to those proposed by existing guidelines. The similarity between the home BP and daytime ambulatory BP thresholds was a clinically relevant finding.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationHumansProspective Studiesambulatory blood pressureblood pressure controlhome blood pressurehypertensionoffice blood pressurethresholds

Identifiers

PMID38038188
PMCPMC10727328
OpenAlexW4389244515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.