ReviewInternational journal of oncology2024
Endocrine nuclear receptors and long non‑coding RNAs reciprocal regulation in cancer (Review).
Review in International journal of oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- LINC01094 exacerbates acute cerebral infarction by regulating miR-499a-5p.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Article
- LncRNAs signatures in gynecological cancers: ovarian and endometrial cancers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Nuclear receptors in health and disease: signaling pathways, biological functions and pharmaceutical interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Estrogen receptors and extracellular matrix: the critical interplay in cancer development and progression.The FEBS journal · 2025Review
- Treatments and cancer: implications for radiologists.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Long Non-Coding RNAs, Nuclear Receptors and Their Cross-Talks in Cancer-Implications and Perspectives.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear receptors (NRs) are transcriptional regulators involved in different aspects of normal cell physiology. Their deregulation is associated with aberrant expression, gene mutations and/or epigenetic alterations that can be related to the pathogenesis of various human diseases, and especially in cancer. In particular, a complex genomic network involved in the development and progression of NR‑mediated cancer has been highlighted. Advanced genomic technologies have made it possible to understand that the expression of any particular NR in a given cancer subtype is only one component of a larger transcriptional machinery that is controlled by multiple associated NRs and transcription factors. Additionally, their ability to regulate and to be regulated by molecules of non‑coding RNAs, microRNAs as well as long non‑coding RNAs, is opening new scenarios for understanding the role of NRs in cancer initiation and progression. In the present review, the authors aimed to outline the reciprocal interactions that exist between the main NRs and long non‑coding RNAs in different tumor diseases, to suggest new diagnostic biomarkers as well as therapeutic strategies for these tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.